Comment on "Continuous quantum measurement: inelastic tunneling and lack of current oscillations"
arXiv:cond-mat/0404549 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.069701
Abstract
This is a comment on recent paper by T.M. Stace and S.D. Barrett, PRL 92, 136802 (2004). We show that the main result of the paper, absence of the spectral peak for continuous weak measurement of coherent oscillations in a qubit, is incorrect.
2 pages, no figures
References in corpus (10)
- Continuous quantum measurement of a double dot
- Continuous weak measurement of quantum coherent oscillations
- Continuous Monitoring of Rabi Oscillations in a Josephson Flux Qubit
- Dynamics of a mesoscopic qubit under continuous quantum measurement
- Output spectrum of a detector measuring quantum oscillations
- Quadratic Quantum Measurements
- Continuous quantum measurement: inelastic tunnelling suppresses current oscillations
- Spectrum of qubit oscillations from Bloch equations
- Noise spectroscopy of a single spin with spin polarized STM
- Output spectrum of a measuring device at arbitrary voltage and temperature
Cited by in corpus (7)
- Spontaneous Relaxation of a Charge Qubit under Electrical Measurement
- Reduced dynamics with renormalization in solid-state charge qubit measurement
- Reply to Comment on "Continuous quantum measurement: inelastic tunneling and lack of current oscillations"
- Simple theory of the measured current through quantum dots
- Quantum measurement of an electron in disordered potential: delocalization versus measurement voltages
- Qubit measurement using a quantum point contact with a quantum Langevin equation approach
- Double detected spin-dependent quantum dot