Probing decisive answers to dark energy questions from cosmic complementarity and lensing tomography
arXiv:astro-ph/0501594 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09393.x
Abstract
We study future constraints on dark energy parameters determined from several combinations of CMB experiments, supernova data, and weak lensing surveys with and without tomography. In this analysis, we look in particular for combinations that will bring the uncertainties to a level of precision tight enough (a few percent) to answer decisively some of the dark energy questions. We probe the dark energy using two variants of its equation of state, and its energy density.We consider a set of 13 cosmological and systematic parameters, and assume reasonable priors on the lensing and supernova systematics. We consider various lensing surveys: a wide survey with f_{sky}=0.7, and with 2 (WLT2) and 5 (WLT5) tomographic bins; a deep survey with 10 bins (WLT10). The constraints found from Planck, 2000 supernovae with z_max=0.8, and WLT2 are: {sigma(w_0)=0.086, sigma(w_1)=0.069}, {sigma(w_0)=0.088, sigma(w_a)=0.11}, and {sigma(E_1)=0.029, sigma(E_2)=0.065}. With 5 bins, we find {sigma(w_0)=0.04, sigma(w_1)=0.034}, {sigma(w_0)=0.041, sigma(w_a)=0.056}, and {sigma(E_1)=0.012, sigma(E_2)=0.049}. Finally, we find from Planck, 2000 supernovae with z_max=1.5, and WLT10 with f_{sky}=0.1: {sigma(w_0)=0.032, sigma(w_1)=0.027}, {sigma(w_0)=0.033, sigma(w_a)=0.040}, and {sigma(E_1)=0.01, sigma(E_2)=0.04}. Although some worries remain about other systematics, our study shows that after the combination of the 3 probes, lensing tomography with many redshift bins and large coverages of the sky has the potential to add key improvements to the dark energy parameter constraints. However, the requirement for very ambitious and sophisticated surveys in order to achieve some of the constraints or to improve them suggests the need for new tests to probe the nature of dark energy in addition to constraining its equation of state. (Abriged)
14 pages, 5 figures; matches MNRAS accepted version
References in corpus (4)
- Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Ly-alpha forest and galaxy bias: constraints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neutrino mass, and dark energy
- Intrinsic alignment-lensing interference as a contaminant of cosmic shear
- Dynamical dark energy: Current constraints and forecasts
- Reconstructing and Deconstructing Dark Energy
Cited by in corpus (37)
- The Shear TEsting Programme 1: Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations
- Systematic Errors in Future Weak Lensing Surveys: Requirements and Prospects for Self-Calibration
- Measuring the dark side (with weak lensing)
- Reconstructing the history of structure formation using redshift distortions
- Robust Dark Energy Constraints from Supernovae, Galaxy Clustering, and Three-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Observations
- Intrinsic galaxy alignments from the 2SLAQ and SDSS surveys: luminosity and redshift scalings and implications for weak lensing surveys
- The Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and its Impact on Weak Gravitational Lensing in an Era of Precision Cosmology
- Effect of Photometric Redshift Uncertainties on Weak Lensing Tomography
- Detection of large scale intrinsic ellipticity-density correlation from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and implications for weak lensing surveys
- Probing Cosmic Acceleration Beyond the Equation of State: Distinguishing between Dark Energy and Modified Gravity Models
- Origins of weak lensing systematics, and requirements on future instrumentation (or knowledge of instrumentation)
- Optimal Surveys for Weak Lensing Tomography
- Probing dark energy with the shear-ratio geometric test
- Measuring neutrino masses and dark energy with weak lensing tomography
- Using Galaxy Two-point Correlation Functions to Determine the Redshift Distributions of Galaxies Binned by Photometric Redshift
- Measuring dark energy properties with 3D cosmic shear
- Consistency test of general relativity from large scale structure of the Universe
- Systematic effects on dark energy from 3D weak shear
- A General Study of the Influence of Catastrophic Photometric Redshift Errors on Cosmology with Cosmic Shear Tomography
- General Requirements on Matter Power Spectrum Predictions for Cosmology with Weak Lensing Tomography
- Remarks on the formulation of the cosmological constant/dark energy problems
- Constraints on early dark energy from CMB lensing and weak lensing tomography
- Bayesian inference from photometric redshift surveys
- Mining the SDSS archive. I. Photometric redshifts in the nearby universe
- Dark energy: investigation and modeling
- Cross-correlation between cosmic microwave background lensing and galaxy intrinsic alignment as a contaminant to gravitational lensing cross-correlated probes of the universe
- Measuring the Cosmic Shear in Fourier Space
- Self-Calibration for 3-point Intrinsic Alignment Auto-Correlations in Weak Lensing Surveys
- Oxidised cosmic acceleration
- Effects of Self-Calibration of Intrinsic Alignment on Cosmological Parameter Constraints from Future Cosmic Shear Surveys
- Inflation and late time acceleration in braneworld cosmological models with varying brane tension
- Simple Treatments of the Photon Noise and the Pixelation Effect in Weak Lensing
- Weak lensing probe of cubic Galileon model
- Separating the Intrinsic Alignment Signal and the Lensing Signal using Self-Calibration in Photo-z Surveys with KiDS450 and KV450 Data
- Self-calibration method for II and GI types of intrinsic alignments of galaxies
- Probing dark energy using convergence power spectrum and bi-spectrum
- Expressing the equation of state parameter in terms of the three dimensional cosmic shear