paper

Dark Energy Tomography

arXiv:astro-ph/0312175 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.063510

Abstract

We study how parameter error forecasts for tomographic cosmic shear observations are affected by sky coverage, density of source galaxies, inclusion of CMB experiments, simultaneou fitting of non--dark energy parameters, and the parametrization of the history of the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w(z). We find tomographic shear-shear power spectra on large angular scales (l<1000) inferred from all-sky observations, in combination with Planck, can achieve sigma(w0)=0.06 and sigma(wa)=0.09 assuming the equation-of-state parameter is given by w(z)=w0+wa(1-a(z)) and that nine other matter content and primordial power spectrum parameters are simultaneously fit. Taking parameters other than w0, wa and Omegam to be completely fixed by the CMB we find errors on w0 and wa that are only 10% and 30% better respectively, justifying this common simplifying assumption. We also study `dark energy tomography': reconstuction of w(z) assumed to be constant within each of five independent redshift bins. With smaller-scale information included by use of the Jain & Taylor ratio statistic we find sigma(wi)<0.1 for all five redshift bins and sigma(wi)<0.02 for both bins at z<0.8. Finally, addition of cosmic shear can also reduce errors on quantities already determined well by the CMB. We find the sum of neutrino masses can be determined to +-0.013eV and that the primordial power specrum power-law index, ns, as well as dns/dlnk, can be determined more than a factor of two better than by Planck alone. These improvements may be highly valuable since the lower bound on the sum of neutrino masses is 0.06eV as inferred from atmospheric neutrino oscillations, and slow-roll models of inflation predict non-zero dns/dlnk at the forecasted error levels when |n_S-1|>0.04.

submitted to PRD

References in corpus (3)

Cited by in corpus (75)