Quantum Monogamy with Predetermined Events

Abstract

The concept of correlation appears straightforward: measurement outcomes coincide, and patterns emerge. For any record of events, the coefficients are uniquely determined. Thus, if correlations change spontaneously, as seen in quantum monogamy, then individual behavior must have changed first. Surprisingly, this is not always true. When two observables are mutually exclusive, they cannot coincide objectively and need to be grouped across time. Yet, sectioning the flow of events into "iterations" is not trivial in this case. Even with blind windows of coincidence, the same order of outcomes can produce different coefficients of correlation, depending on the number of joint measurements. Therefore, quantum monogamy can happen with fixed pre-determined events. A new concept ("subjective correlation") is required to explain this phenomenon.

12 pages, 4 figures, 1 appendix

References in corpus (24)

• Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km
• Distributed Entanglement
• Significant-loophole-free test of Bell's theorem with entangled photons
• A strong loophole-free test of local realism
• General Monogamy Inequality for Bipartite Qubit Entanglement
• From Bell's Theorem to Secure Quantum Key Distribution
• Monogamy of entanglement and other correlations
• Event-Ready Bell Test Using Entangled Atoms Simultaneously Closing Detection and Locality Loopholes
• Loopholes in Bell Inequality Tests of Local Realism
• Is Entanglement Monogamous?
• Quantum simulation of the wavefunction to probe frustrated Heisenberg spin systems
• Rethinking Superdeterminism
• Security proof for cryptographic protocols based only on the monogamy of Bell's inequality violations
• Black Hole Entanglement and Quantum Error Correction
• Monogamy of quantum correlations - a review
• A Monogamy-of-Entanglement Game With Applications to Device-Independent Quantum Cryptography
• Bell's theorem: Critique of proofs with and without inequalities
• Monogamy of Correlations vs. Monogamy of Entanglement
• Getting rid of nonlocality from quantum physics
• A New Class of Retrocausal Models
• Bell monogamy relations in arbitrary qubit networks
• Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments: a discrete data driven approach
• Verification of Bell Nonlocality by Violating Quantum Monogamy Relations
• Can foreign exchange rates violate Bell inequalities?