The Effect of Foreground Galaxies on the Estimation of the Hubble Constant from Type Ia Supernovae

Abstract

Type Ia supernovae are the established `standard candle' in the construction of the Hubble diagram out to high luminosity distances. Since the Hubble constant that best fits observations of these supernovae often turns out to be high compared to fits to other data, they are currently being investigated for possible systematic effects, with many studies focusing on the calibration of the distance ladder in the local Universe. Here we present a simulation-based assessment of another type of systematic effect, related to the chance that the line of sight to a distant supernova passes close to a foreground galaxy. We consider two cases separately: First, the foreground galaxy may block the line of sight so that the supernova is not observed. Since foreground galaxies are correlated with overdensities that typically magnify the flux of background sources, this effect leads to a systematic removal of lensed supernovae from the sample, biasing the high-redshift Hubble diagram towards demagnified (fainter) supernovae. Second, if the supernova can be observed, its proximity to the foreground galaxy can lead to an incorrect host assignment, especially if the true host has a low surface brightness. Since foreground galaxies are typically found at lower redshifts, this effect introduces another systematic bias. The probability of line-of-sight alignments with foreground galaxies increases with redshift and therefore affects distant supernovae more strongly. We find that both effects are small, but the effect of host misidentification should be included in the systematic error budget at current levels of measurement precision.

arXiv commentAccepted version. Matches published article

References in corpus (20)

• emcee: The MCMC Hammer
• The Seventh Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
• A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team
• The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes
• In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions
• The Rockstar Phase-Space Temporal Halo Finder and the Velocity Offsets of Cluster Cores
• The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints
• 3D-HST+CANDELS: The Evolution of the Galaxy Size-Mass Distribution since $z=3$
• The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release
• Long Gamma-Ray Bursts and Type Ic Core Collapse Supernovae Have Similar Locations in Hosts
• Safety in numbers: Gravitational Lensing Degradation of the Luminosity Distance-Redshift Relation
• gevolution: a cosmological N-body code based on General Relativity
• The Pantheon+ Analysis: Improving the Redshifts and Peculiar Velocities of Type Ia Supernovae Used in Cosmological Analyses
• The Pantheon+ Analysis: Evaluating Peculiar Velocity Corrections in Cosmological Analyses with Nearby Type Ia Supernovae
• Host Galaxy Identification for Supernova Surveys
• A review of elliptical and disc galaxy structure, and modern scaling laws
• Can redshift errors bias measurements of the Hubble Constant?
• Bias and scatter in the Hubble diagram from cosmological large-scale structure
• How does the cosmic large-scale structure bias the Hubble diagram?
• Weak-lensing observables in relativistic N-body simulations