Is the $w_0w_a$CDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck CMB anisotropy data?

Chan-Gyung Park; Javier de Cruz Perez; Bharat Ratra

doi:10.1142/S0218271825500580

paper

Is the $w_{0} w_{a}$ CDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck CMB anisotropy data?

arXiv:2410.13627 · doi:10.1142/S0218271825500580

Abstract

We study the performance of the spatially-flat dynamical dark energy (DE) $w_{0} w_{a}$ CDM parameterization, with redshift-dependent DE fluid equation of state parameter $w (z) = w_{0} + w_{a} z / (1 + z)$ , with and without a varying CMB lensing consistency parameter $A_{L}$ , against Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) data (P18 and lensing) and a combination of non-CMB data composed of baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements that do not include DESI BAO data, Pantheon+ type Ia supernovae (SNIa) observations, Hubble parameter [ $H (z)$ ] measurements, and growth factor ( $f σ_{8}$ ) data points. From our most restrictive data set, P18+lensing+non-CMB, for the $w_{0} w_{a}$ CDM+ $A_{L}$ parameterization, we obtain $w_{0} = - 0.879 \pm 0.060$ , $w_{a} = - 0.3 9_{- 0.22}^{+ 0.26}$ , the asymptotic limit $w (z \to \infty) = w_{0} + w_{a} = - 1.2 7_{- 0.17}^{+ 0.20}$ , and $A_{L} = 1.07 8_{- 0.040}^{+ 0.036}$ (all $1 σ$ errors). This joint analysis of CMB and non-CMB data favors DE dynamics over a cosmological constant at $\sim 1 σ$ and $A_{L} > 1$ at $\sim 2 σ$ , i.e. more smoothing of the Planck CMB anisotropy data than is predicted by the best-fit model. For the $w_{0} w_{a}$ CDM parameterization with $A_{L} = 1$ the evidence in favor of DE dynamics is larger, $\sim 2 σ$ , suggesting that at least part of the evidence for DE dynamics comes from the excess smoothing of the Planck CMB anisotropy data. For the $w_{0} w_{a}$ CDM parameterization with $A_{L} = 1$ , there is a difference of $2.8 σ$ between P18 and non-CMB cosmological parameter constraints and $2.7 σ$ between P18+lensing and non-CMB constraints. When $A_{L}$ is allowed to vary these tensions reduced to $1.9 σ$ and $2.1 σ$ respectively. Our P18+lensing+non-CMB data compilation positively favors the $w_{0} w_{a}$ CDM parameterization without and with a varying $A_{L}$ parameter over the flat $Λ$ CDM model, and $w_{0} w_{a}$ CDM+ $A_{L}$ is also positively favored over $w_{0} w_{a}$ CDM.

19 pages, 6 figures. Accepted for publication in International Journal of Modern Physics D. Related to the analyses of arXiv:2405.00502

Is the $w_{0} w_{a}$ CDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck CMB anisotropy data?

Abstract

References in corpus (21)

Cited by in corpus (24)

Is the w0​wa​CDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck CMB anisotropy data?

Abstract

References in corpus (21)

Cited by in corpus (24)

Is the $w_{0} w_{a}$ CDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck CMB anisotropy data?