Machine Learning Processes as Sources of Ambiguity: Insights from AI Art

Abstract

Ongoing efforts to turn Machine Learning (ML) into a design material have encountered limited success. This paper examines the burgeoning area of AI art to understand how artists incorporate ML in their creative work. Drawing upon related HCI theories, we investigate how artists create ambiguity by analyzing nine AI artworks that use computer vision and image synthesis. Our analysis shows that, in addition to the established types of ambiguity, artists worked closely with the ML process (dataset curation, model training, and application) and developed various techniques to evoke the ambiguity of processes. Our finding indicates that the current conceptualization of ML as a design material needs to reframe the ML process as design elements, instead of technical details. Finally, this paper offers reflections on commonly held assumptions in HCI about ML uncertainty, dependability, and explainability, and advocates to supplement the artifact-centered design perspective of ML with a process-centered one.

References in corpus (7)

• Machine Learning Uncertainty as a Design Material: A Post-Phenomenological Inquiry
• Making Space for Stories: Ambiguity in the Design of Personal Communication Systems
• Deep Else: A Critical Framework for AI Art
• The Entoptic Field Camera as Metaphor-Driven Research-through-Design with AI Technologies
• Visual Indeterminacy in GAN Art
• Learning to See: You Are What You See
• Sensitive Pictures: Emotional Interpretation in the Museum

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Un-Straightening Generative AI: How Queer Artists Surface and Challenge the Normativity of Generative AI Models
• User Experience with LLM-powered Conversational Recommendation Systems: A Case of Music Recommendation
• The Centers and Margins of Modeling Humans in Well-being Technologies: A Decentering Approach