Are Large Language Models Aligned with People's Social Intuitions for Human-Robot Interactions?
arXiv:2403.05701 · doi:10.1109/IROS58592.2024.10801325
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in robotics, especially for high-level action planning. Meanwhile, many robotics applications involve human supervisors or collaborators. Hence, it is crucial for LLMs to generate socially acceptable actions that align with people's preferences and values. In this work, we test whether LLMs capture people's intuitions about behavior judgments and communication preferences in human-robot interaction (HRI) scenarios. For evaluation, we reproduce three HRI user studies, comparing the output of LLMs with that of real participants. We find that GPT-4 strongly outperforms other models, generating answers that correlate strongly with users' answers in two studies $\unicode{x2014}$ the first study dealing with selecting the most appropriate communicative act for a robot in various situations ( = 0.82), and the second with judging the desirability, intentionality, and surprisingness of behavior ( = 0.83). However, for the last study, testing whether people judge the behavior of robots and humans differently, no model achieves strong correlations. Moreover, we show that vision models fail to capture the essence of video stimuli and that LLMs tend to rate different communicative acts and behavior desirability higher than people.
Accepted at IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2024
References in corpus (7)
- Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances
- RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control
- Thinking Fast and Slow in Large Language Models
- Human-Like Intuitive Behavior and Reasoning Biases Emerged in Language Models -- and Disappeared in GPT-4
- Understanding Large-Language Model (LLM)-powered Human-Robot Interaction
- Large Language Models as Zero-Shot Human Models for Human-Robot Interaction
- Theory of Mind abilities of Large Language Models in Human-Robot Interaction : An Illusion?