paper

Electronic structure, magnetic correlations, and superconducting pairing in the reduced Ruddlesden-Popper bilayer LaNiO under pressure: different role of orbital compared with LaNiO

arXiv:2310.17871 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.045151

Abstract

The recent discovery of superconductivity in bilayer LaNiO (327-LNO) under pressure stimulated much interest in layered nickelates. However, superconductivity was not found in another bilayer nickelate system, LaNiO (326-LNO), even under pressure. Using density functional theory and the random phase approximation (RPA), we systematically investigate 326-LNO under pressure. The large crystal-field splitting between the orbitals caused by the missing apical oxygen moves the orbital farther away from the Fermi level, implying that the orbital plays a less important role in 326-LNO than in 327-LNO. This also results in a smaller bandwidth for the orbital and a reduced energy gap for the bonding-antibonding splitting of the orbital in 326-LNO, as compared to 327-LNO. Moreover, the in-plane hybridization between the and orbitals is found to be small in 326-LNO, while it is much stronger in 327-LNO. The weak inter-layer coupling suggests that -wave pairing is unlikely in 326-LNO. The robust in-plane ferromagnetic coupling also suggests that d-wave superconductivity, which is usually caused by antiferromagnetic fluctuations of the orbital, is also unlikely in 326-LNO. These conclusions are supported by our many-body RPA calculations of the pairing behavior. Contrasting with the cuprates, for the bilayer cuprate HgBaCaCuO, we find a strong "self-doping effect" of the orbital under pressure, with the charge of Cu being reduced by approximately 0.13 electrons from 0 GPa to 25 GPa. In contrast, we do not observe such a change in the electronic density in 326-LNO under pressure, establishing another important difference between the nickelates and the cuprates.

9 pages 6 figures

References in corpus (10)

Cited by in corpus (33)