Interactive diversity disrupts cyclic dominance but maintains cooperation in spatial social dilemma games

Abstract

Cyclic dominance has become a pivotal factor in sustaining cooperation within structured populations. However, this comprehension has predominantly revolved around node dynamics, where players are confined to employing the same strategy with all their neighbors. What has been largely overlooked is the profound influence of interactive diversity, where players can adapt distinct responses to different neighbors, on the dynamics of cyclic dominance and the broader patterns of cooperation. This investigation delves into the often-neglected role of interactive diversity in cyclic dominance and cooperation, utilizing a volunteer prisoner's dilemma model deployed on various network structures. Within this framework, we differentiate between `node players,' who adhere to a consistent strategy with all their neighbors, and `link players,' who adjust their strategies based on specific interactions, influenced by both direct and indirect emotional factors. Direct emotion governs the strategy between two interacting players, while indirect emotion encompasses the impact of third-party influences on strategic decisions. Through Monte Carlo simulations, we unveil a multifaceted relationship: interactive diversity generally disrupts cyclic dominance, yet its impact on cooperation varies, contingent on the prevalence of indirect strategy formulation. These findings suggest that the significance of cyclic dominance in fostering cooperation may have been overemphasized, as cooperation can persist even in the absence of strong cyclic dominance, owing to the presence of interactive diversity.

References in corpus (20)

• Evolutionary games on graphs
• Coevolutionary games - a mini review
• Reward and cooperation in the spatial public goods game
• Phase diagrams for Prisoner's Dilemma game on two-dimensional lattices
• Human strategy updating in evolutionary games
• Making new connections towards cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game
• Conformity enhances network reciprocity in evolutionary social dilemmas
• Self-organization of punishment in structured populations
• Defense mechanisms of empathetic players in the spatial ultimatum game
• Evolutionary advantages of adaptive rewarding
• Group-size effects on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game
• Leaders should not be conformists in evolutionary social dilemmas
• A double-edged sword: Benefits and pitfalls of heterogeneous punishment in evolutionary inspection games
• Competition and partnership between conformity and payoff-based imitations in social dilemmas
• Deterministic limit of temporal difference reinforcement learning for stochastic games
• Imitate or innovate: competition of strategy updating attitudes in spatial social dilemma games
• Seasonal payoff variations and the evolution of cooperation in social dilemmas
• Dynamic-sensitive cooperation in the presence of multiple strategy updating rules
• The conflict between self-interaction and updating passivity in the evolution of cooperation
• Long-Term Fairness with Unknown Dynamics

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Reputation in public goods cooperation under double Q-learning protocol
• Supervised cooperation on interdependent public goods games
• Shaping the learning signal in a combined Q-learning rule to improve structured cooperation