Inaccuracies and biases of the Gaussian size deconvolution for extracted sources and filaments
arXiv:2306.01563 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346152
Abstract
A simple Gaussian size deconvolution method is routinely used to remove the blur of observed images caused by insufficient angular resolutions of existing telescopes, thereby to estimate the physical sizes of extracted sources and filaments. The size deconvolution method is expected to work when the structures, as well as the telescope beams, have Gaussian shapes. This study employed model images of the spherical and cylindrical objects with Gaussian and power-law shapes, representing the dense cores and filaments. The images are convolved to a wide range of angular resolutions to probe various degrees of resolvedness of the models. Simplified flat, convex, and concave backgrounds were added to the images, then planar backgrounds across the footprints of the structures are subtracted and sizes were measured and deconvolved. When background subtraction is inaccurate, the structures acquire profoundly non-Gaussian profiles. The deconvolved half maximum sizes can be strongly under- or overestimated, by factors of up to ~20 when the structures are unresolved or partially resolved. For resolved structures, the errors are within a factor of ~2; although some power-law models show the factors of up to ~6. The size deconvolution method cannot be applied to unresolved structures, it can only be used for the Gaussian-like structures, including the critical Bonnor-Ebert spheres, when they are at least partially resolved. The method must be considered inapplicable for the power-law structures with shallow profiles. This work also reveals subtle properties of convolution for different geometries. When convolved with different kernels, spherical objects and cylindrical filaments with identical profiles obtain different widths and shapes. A filament, imaged by the telescope with a non-Gaussian PSF, could appear substantially shallower than the structure is in reality, even when it is resolved.
arXiv comment20 pages, 17 figures, 5 tables, accepted by Astronomy & Astrophysics, final language-edited version
References in corpus (19)
- Characterizing interstellar filaments with Herschel in IC5146
- Herschel view of the Taurus B211/3 filament and striations: Evidence of filamentary growth?
- Common-Resolution Convolution Kernels for Space- and Ground-Based Telescopes
- An ALMA study of the Orion Integral Filament: I. Evidence for narrow fibers in a massive cloud
- Characterizing the properties of nearby molecular filaments observed with Herschel
- From Massive Protostars to a Giant HII Region: Submillimeter Imaging of the Galactic Mini-starburst W43
- Fragmentation and mass segregation in the massive dense cores of Cygnus X
- A multi-scale, multi-wavelength source extraction method: getsources
- Source extraction and photometry for the far-infrared and sub-millimeter continuum in the presence of complex backgrounds
- The Herschel view of massive star formation in G035.39--00.33: Dense and cold filament of W48 undergoing a mini-starburst
- Characterizing filaments in regions of high-mass star formation: High-resolution submilimeter imaging of the massive star-forming complex NGC 6334 with ArTéMiS
- The Herschel view of the dense core population in the Ophiuchus molecular cloud
- Multiscale, multiwavelength extraction of sources and filaments using separation of the structural components: getsf
- On the typical width of Herschel filaments
- Strong dependence of the physical properties of cores on spatial resolution in observations and simulations
- Multicomponent, multiwavelength benchmarks for source- and filament-extraction methods
- AZEuS: An Adaptive Zone Eulerian Scheme for Computational MHD
- Will ALMA Reveal the True Core Mass Function of Protoclusters?
- IC 5146 dark Streamer: is a first reliable candidate of edge collapse, hub-filament systems, and intertwined sub-filaments?