Vacillating about media bias: changing one's mind intermittently within a network of political allies and opponents
arXiv:2207.00372 · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2022.127829
Abstract
One form of long-term behavior revealed by opinion dynamics simulations is intermittency, where an individual cycles between eras of stable, constant beliefs and turbulent, fluctuating beliefs, for example when inferring the political bias of a media organization. We explore this phenomenon by building an idealized network of Bayesian learners, who infer the bias of a coin from observations of coin tosses and peer pressure from political allies and opponents. Numerical simulations reveal that three types of network structure lead to three different types of intermittency, which are caused by agents ``locking out'' opponents from sure beliefs in specific ways. The probability density functions of the dwell times, over which the learners sustain stable or turbulent beliefs, differ across the three types of intermittency. Hence, one can observe the dwell times of a learner to infer the underlying network structure, at least in principle.
arXiv comment29 pages, 18 figures. Published in Physica A
References in corpus (9)
- Emergence of scaling in random networks
- Array Programming with NumPy
- Social Balance on Networks: The Dynamics of Friendship and Enmity
- Recent advances in opinion propagation dynamics: A 2020 Survey
- Mass media and heterogeneous bounds of confidence in continuous opinion dynamics
- Mass media and repulsive interactions in continuous-opinion dynamics
- A Model for the Influence of Media on the Ideology of Content in Online Social Networks
- Opinion dynamics with disagreement and modulated information
- Discerning media bias within a network of political allies and opponents: the idealized example of a biased coin