What can Gaussian Processes really tell us about supernova lightcurves? Consequences for Type II(b) morphologies and genealogies
arXiv:2206.14816 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3523
Abstract
Machine learning has become widely used in astronomy. Gaussian Process (GP) regression in particular has been employed a number of times to fit or re-sample supernova (SN) light-curves, however by their nature typical GP models are not suited to fit SN photometric data and they will be prone to over-fitting. Recently GP re-sampling was used in the context of studying the morphologies of type II and IIb SNe and they were found to be clearly distinct with respect to four parameters: the rise time (t), the magnitude difference between 40 and 30 days post explosion (), the earliest maximum (post-peak) of the first derivative (dm1) and minimum of the second derivative (dm2). Here we take a close look at GP regression and its limitations in the context of SN light-curves in general, and we also discuss the uncertainties on these specific parameters, finding that dm1 and dm2 cannot give reliable astrophysical information. We do reproduce the clustering in t-- space although it is not as clear cut as previously presented. The best strategy to accurately populate the t-- space will be to use an expanded sample of high quality light-curves (such as those in the ATLAS transient survey) and analytical fitting methods. Finally, using the BPASS fiducial models, we predict that future photometric studies will reveal clear clustering of the type IIb and II light curve morphologies with a distinct continuum of transitional events.
13 pages, 11 figures, 2 tables, Accepted for publication in MNRAS
References in corpus (20)
- Binary Population and Spectral Synthesis Version 2.1: construction, observational verification and new results
- Determining the Type, Redshift, and Age of a Supernova Spectrum
- Characterizing the V-band light-curves of hydrogen-rich type II supernovae
- SOUSA: the Swift Optical/Ultraviolet Supernova Archive
- Towards Characterization of the Type IIP Supernova Progenitor Population: a Statistical Sample of Light Curves from Pan-STARRS1
- Photometric and Spectroscopic Properties of Type II-P Supernovae
- Type II supernova spectral diversity I: Observations, sample characterization and spectral line evolution
- The type IIb SN 2008ax: spectral and light curve evolution
- The Type IIP Supernova 2012aw in M95: hydrodynamical modelling of the photospheric phase from accurate spectrophotometric monitoring
- SN 2013df, a double-peaked IIb supernova from a compact progenitor and an extended H envelope
- The Berkeley sample of Type II supernovae: BVRI light curves and spectroscopy of 55 SNe II
- SN 2009ib: A Type II-P Supernova with an Unusually Long Plateau
- Hoki: Making BPASS accessible through Python
- Type II Supernova Light Curves and Spectra From the CfA
- The distance, supernova rate and supernova progenitors of NGC 6946
- Evaluating the impact of binary parameter uncertainty on stellar population properties
- Forward Modelling the O3(a+b) GW transient mass distributions with BPASS by varying compact remnant mass and SNe kick prescriptions
- Binary Fraction Indicators in Resolved Stellar Populations and Supernova Type Ratios
- To be or not to be a black hole: detailed binary population models as a sanity check
- SN 2013ai: a link between hydrogen-rich and hydrogen-poor core-collapse supernovae
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Carnegie Supernova Project-II: Near-infrared spectral diversity and template of Type Ia Supernovae
- Understanding of the properties of neural network approaches for transient light curve approximations
- Impact of Rubin Observatory cadence choices on supernovae photometric classification
- The enigmatic double-peaked stripped-envelope SN 2023aew
- New Metrics for Identifying Variables and Transients in Large Astronomical Surveys
- A graph-based spectral classification of Type II supernovae