paper

Phase diagram of nickelate superconductors calculated by dynamical vertex approximation

arXiv:2201.01220 · doi:10.3389/fphy.2021.810394

Abstract

We review the electronic structure of nickelate superconductors with and without effects of electronic correlations. As a minimal model we identify the one-band Hubbard model for the Ni 3 orbital plus a pocket around the -momentum. The latter however merely acts as a decoupled electron reservoir. This reservoir makes a careful translation from {nominal} Sr-doping to the doping of the one-band Hubbard model mandatory. Our dynamical mean-field theory calculations, in part already supported by experiment, indicate that the pocket, Nd 4 orbitals, oxygen 2 and {the} other Ni 3 orbitals are not relevant in the superconducting doping regime. The physics is completely different if topotactic hydrogen is present or the oxygen reduction is incomplete. Then, a two-band physics hosted by the Ni 3 and 3 orbitals emerges. Based on our minimal modeling we calculated the superconducting vs. Sr-doping phase diagram prior to experiment using the dynamical vertex approximation. For such a notoriously difficult to determine quantity as , the agreement with experiment is astonishingly good. The prediction that is enhanced with pressure or compressive strain, has been confirmed experimentally as well. This supports that the one-band Hubbard model plus an electron reservoir is the appropriate minimal model.

20 pages; 9 figuress; 3 tables; to be published in Frontiers in Physics as part of a series on nickelate superconductors

References in corpus (18)

Cited by in corpus (31)