A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly-Accurate Energies and Benchmarks for Bicyclic Systems
arXiv:2109.13894 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.1c08524
Abstract
Pursuing our efforts to define highly-accurate estimates of the relative energies of excited states in organic molecules, we investigate, with coupled-cluster methods including iterative triples (CC3 and CCSDT), the vertical excitation energies of 10 bicyclic molecules (azulene, benzoxadiazole, benzothiadiazole, diketopyrrolopyrrole, fuofuran, phthalazine, pyrrolopyrrole, quinoxaline, tetrathiafulvalene, and thienothiophene). In total, we provide \emph{aug}-cc-pVTZ reference vertical excitation energies for 91 excited states of these relatively large systems. We use these reference values to benchmark various wave function methods, i.e., CIS(D), EOM-MP2, CC2, CCSD, STEOM-CCSD, CCSD(T)(a)*, CCSDR(3), CCSDT-3, ADC(2), ADC(2.5), ADC(3), as well as some spin-scaled variants of both CC2 and ADC(2). These results are compared to those obtained previously on smaller molecules. It turns out that while the accuracy of some methods is almost unaffected by system size, e.g., CIS(D) and CC3, the performance of others can significantly deteriorate as the systems grow, e.g., EOM-MP2 and CCSD, whereas others, e.g., ADC(2) and CC2, become more accurate for larger derivatives.
19 pages, 2 figures
References in corpus (6)
- Orbital Optimized Density Functional Theory for Electronic Excited States
- QUESTDB: a database of highly-accurate excitation energies for the electronic structure community
- Reference Energies for Intramolecular Charge-Transfer Excitations
- Excited States From State Specific Orbital Optimized Pair Coupled Cluster
- How accurate are EOM-CC4 vertical excitation energies?
- Time-dependent photoionization of azulene: Competition between ionization and relaxation in highly excited states