Is ADC(3) as Accurate as CC3 for Valence and Rydberg Transition Energies?

Abstract

The search for new \emph{ab initio} models rapidly delivering accurate excited state energies and properties is one of the most active research lines of theoretical chemistry. Along with these methodological developments, the performances of known methods are constantly reassessed thanks to the emergence of new benchmark values. In this Letter, we show that, in contrast to previous claims, the third-order algebraic diagrammatic construction, ADC(3), does not yield transition energies of the same quality as the third-order coupled cluster method, CC3. There is indeed a significant difference in terms of accuracy between the two approaches, as we clearly and unambiguously demonstrate here thanks to extensive comparisons with several hundreds high-quality vertical transition energies obtained with FCI, CCSDTQ, and CCSDT. Direct comparisons with experimental 0-0 energies of small- and medium-size organic molecules support the same conclusion, which holds for both valence and Rydberg transitions, as well as singlet and triplet states. In regards of these results, we introduce a composite approach that we named ADC(2.5) which consists in averaging the ADC(2) and ADC(3) excitation energies. Although ADC(2.5) does not match the CC3 accuracy, it significantly improves the ADC(3) results, especially for vertical energies. We hope that the present contribution will stimulate further developments and, in particular, improvements of the ADC-type methods which have the indisputable advantage of being computationally lighter than their equivalent-order CC variants.

8 pages, 2 figures (supporting information available)

References in corpus (2)

• A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly-Accurate Energies and Benchmarks for Medium Size Molecules
• Evaluating 0-0 Energies with Theoretical Tools: a Short Review

Cited by in corpus (17)

• Benchmarking TD-DFT and Wave Function Methods for Oscillator Strengths and Excited-State Dipole Moments
• The Quest For Highly Accurate Excitation Energies: A Computational Perspective
• QUESTDB: a database of highly-accurate excitation energies for the electronic structure community
• Reference Energies for Intramolecular Charge-Transfer Excitations
• A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly-Accurate Energies and Benchmarks for Exotic Molecules and Radicals
• Assessing the Performances of CASPT2 and NEVPT2 for Vertical Excitation Energies
• Connections and performances of Green's function methods for charged and neutral excitations
• Dynamical Correction to the Bethe-Salpeter Equation Beyond the Plasmon-Pole Approximation
• Weight Dependence of Local Exchange-Correlation Functionals in Ensemble Density-Functional Theory: Double Excitations in Two-Electron Systems
• A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Revising Reference Values with EOM-CC4
• Reference Energies for Cyclobutadiene: Automerization and Excited States
• Reference CC3 Excitation Energies for Organic Chromophores: Benchmarking TD-DFT, BSE/$GW$ and Wave Function Methods
• The QUEST Database of Highly-Accurate Excitation Energies
• Benchmarking CASPT3 Vertical Excitation Energies
• Revisiting the performance of time-dependent density functional theory for electronic excitations: Assessment of 43 popular and recently developed functionals from rungs one to four
• A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly-Accurate Energies and Benchmarks for Bicyclic Systems
• A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Accurate Vertical Transition Energies and Benchmarks for Substituted Benzenes