An Approximation for the Capture Radius of Gaseous Protoplanets
arXiv:2107.12764 · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slab089
Abstract
Determining the heavy-element accretion rate of growing giant planets is crucial for understanding their formation and bulk composition. The solid (heavy-element) accretion rate should be carefully modeled during the various stages of giant planet formation and therefore, the planetary capture radius must be determined. In some simulations that model the heavy-element accretion rate, such as in N-body simulations, the presence of the gaseous envelope is either neglected, or treated in an over-simplified manner. In this paper, we present an approximation for the capture radius that does not require the numerical solution of the stellar structure equations. Our approximation for the capture radius works extremely well for various planetesimal sizes and compositions. We show that the commonly assumed constant density assumption for inferring the capture radius leads to a large error in the calculated capture radius and we therefore suggest that our approximation should be implemented in future simulations.
References in corpus (5)
- Minimum Core Masses for Giant Planet Formation With Realistic Equations of State and Opacities
- The origin of the high metallicity of close-in giant exoplanets: Combined effect of the resonant and aerodynamic shepherding
- The Formation of Uranus & Neptune: Challenges and Implications For Intermediate-Mass Exoplanets
- Capture of Solids by Growing Proto-gas Giants: Effects of Gap Formation and Supply-limited Growth
- The End of Runaway: How Gap Opening Limits the Final Masses of Gas Giants
Cited by in corpus (5)
- Composition of giant planets: the roles of pebbles and planetesimals
- Enrichment of Jupiter's atmosphere by late planetesimal bombardment
- A low accretion efficiency of planetesimals formed at planetary gap edges
- Heavy-element Accretion by Proto-Jupiter in a Massive Planetesimal Disk, Revisited
- The infrared colors of 51 Eridani b: micrometereoid dust or chemical disequilibrium?