Average number is an insufficient metric for interferometry

Abstract

We argue that analysing schemes for metrology solely in terms of the average particle number can obscure the number of particles effectively used in informative events. For a number of states we demonstrate that, in both frequentist and Bayesian frameworks, the average number of a state can essentially be decoupled from the aspects of the total number distribution associated with any metrological advantage.

References in corpus (16)

• Detection of 15 dB Squeezed States of Light and their Application for the Absolute Calibration of Photoelectric Quantum Efficiency
• Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective
• Boson sampling with 20 input photons in 60-mode interferometers at $10^{14}$ state spaces
• Optimal phase measurements with pure Gaussian states
• Quantum metrology with imperfect states and detectors
• True precision limits in quantum metrology
• Phase estimation without a priori knowledge in the presence of loss
• All path-symmetric pure states achieve their maximal phase sensitivity in conventional two-path interferometry
• Optimal Quantum-Enhanced Interferometry
• Does nonlinear metrology offer improved resolution? Answers from quantum information theory
• Quantum correlations in optical metrology: Heisenberg-limited phase estimation without mode entanglement
• Phase sensitivity bounds for two-mode interferometers
• Quantum Metrology: Extended Convexity of Quantum Fisher Information
• Optimal Heisenberg-style bounds for the average performance of arbitrary phase estimates
• Non-asymptotic analysis of quantum metrology protocols beyond the Cramér-Rao bound
• Breaking the weak Heisenberg limit