Become a better you: correlation between the change of research direction and the change of scientific performance

Abstract

It is important to explore how scientists decide their research agenda and the corresponding consequences, as their decisions collectively shape contemporary science. There are studies focusing on the overall performance of individuals with different problem choosing strategies. Here we ask a slightly different but relatively unexplored question: how is a scientist's change of research agenda associated with her change of scientific performance. Using publication records of over 14,000 authors in physics, we quantitatively measure the extent of research direction change and the performance change of individuals. We identify a strong positive correlation between the direction change and impact change. Scientists with a larger direction change not only are more likely to produce works with increased scientific impact compared to their past ones, but also have a higher growth rate of scientific impact. On the other hand, the direction change is not associated with productivity change. Those who stay in familiar topics do not publish faster than those who venture out and establish themselves in a new field. The gauge of research direction in this work is uncorrelated with the diversity of research agenda and the switching probability among topics, capturing the evolution of individual careers from a new point of view. Though the finding is inevitably affected by the survival bias, it sheds light on a range of problems in the career development of individual scientists.

arXiv comment22 pages, 4 figures, and SI, to be published in Journal of Informetrics

References in corpus (19)

• Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines
• Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact
• Universality of citation distributions: towards an objective measure of scientific impact
• The Preeminence of Ethnic Diversity in Scientific Collaboration
• Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in a study of career longevity
• Collective credit allocation in science
• Hot Streaks in Artistic, Cultural, and Scientific Careers
• Career on the Move: Geography, Stratification, and Scientific Impact
• Quantifying patterns of research interest evolution
• Increasing trend of scientists to switch between topics
• The misleading narrative of the canonical faculty productivity trajectory
• The many faces of mobility: Using bibliometric data to measure the movement of scientists
• Scientific elite revisited: Patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact
• Early-career setback and future career impact
• QAnswer: Towards Question Answering Search over Websites
• Quantifying dynamics of failure across science, startups, and security
• Knowledge Evolution in Physics Research: An Analysis of Bibliographic Coupling Networks
• Where is your field going? A Machine Learning approach to study the relative motion of the domains of Physics
• A paper's corresponding affiliation and first affiliation are consistent at the country level in Web of Science

Cited by in corpus (2)

• Should Young Computer Scientists Stop Collaborating with their Doctoral Advisors?
• Measuring Research Interest Similarity with Transition Probabilities