Violations of locality and free choice are equivalent resources in Bell experiments

Abstract

Bell inequalities rest on three fundamental assumptions: realism, locality, and free choice, which lead to nontrivial constraints on correlations in very simple experiments. If we retain realism, then violation of the inequalities implies that at least one of the remaining two assumptions must fail, which can have profound consequences for the causal explanation of the experiment. We investigate the extent to which a given assumption needs to be relaxed for the other to hold at all costs, based on the observation that a violation need not occur on every experimental trial, even when describing correlations violating Bell inequalities. How often this needs to be the case determines the degree of, respectively, locality or free choice in the observed experimental behavior. Despite their disparate character, we show that both assumptions are equally costly. Namely, the resources required to explain the experimental statistics (measured by the frequency of causal interventions of either sort) are exactly the same. Furthermore, we compute such defined measures of locality and free choice for any nonsignaling statistics in a Bell experiment with binary settings, showing that it is directly related to the amount of violation of the so-called Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequalities. This result is theory independent as it refers directly to the experimental statistics. Additionally, we show how the local fraction results for quantum-mechanical frameworks with infinite number of settings translate into analogous statements for the measure of free choice we introduce. Thus, concerning statistics, causal explanations resorting to either locality or free choice violations are fully interchangeable.

10 pages, 3 figures; includes Supplementary Information (5 pages, 2 figures)

References in corpus (13)

• A simple test for hidden variables in spin-1 system
• The Communication Cost of Simulating Bell Correlations
• Local deterministic model of singlet state correlations based on relaxing measurement independence
• Relaxed Bell inequalities and Kochen-Specker theorems
• The contextual fraction as a measure of contextuality
• A unifying framework for relaxations of the causal assumptions in Bell's theorem
• Hidden variable models for quantum theory cannot have any local part
• Against `Realism'
• The effects of reduced "free will" on Bell-based randomness expansion
• The local content of all pure two-qubit states
• Demonstration of Quantum Nonlocality in presence of Measurement Dependence
• A short note on the concept of free choice
• Proposal to use Humans to switch settings in a Bell experiment

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Quantum Nonlocality: how does Nature do it?
• Can foreign exchange rates violate Bell inequalities?
• Comparing the cost of violating causal assumptions in Bell experiments: locality, free choice and arrow-of-time