Deepfake Detection by Human Crowds, Machines, and Machine-informed Crowds
arXiv:2105.06496 · doi:10.1073/pnas.2110013119
Abstract
The recent emergence of machine-manipulated media raises an important societal question: how can we know if a video that we watch is real or fake? In two online studies with 15,016 participants, we present authentic videos and deepfakes and ask participants to identify which is which. We compare the performance of ordinary human observers against the leading computer vision deepfake detection model and find them similarly accurate while making different kinds of mistakes. Together, participants with access to the model's prediction are more accurate than either alone, but inaccurate model predictions often decrease participants' accuracy. To probe the relative strengths and weaknesses of humans and machines as detectors of deepfakes, we examine human and machine performance across video-level features, and we evaluate the impact of pre-registered randomized interventions on deepfake detection. We find that manipulations designed to disrupt visual processing of faces hinder human participants' performance while mostly not affecting the model's performance, suggesting a role for specialized cognitive capacities in explaining human deepfake detection performance.
References in corpus (7)
- The science of fake news
- A Lip Sync Expert Is All You Need for Speech to Lip Generation In The Wild
- DeepFakes: a New Threat to Face Recognition? Assessment and Detection
- Deepfake Detection by Human Crowds, Machines, and Machine-informed Crowds
- DeepRhythm: Exposing DeepFakes with Attentional Visual Heartbeat Rhythms
- The Deepfake Detection Dilemma: A Multistakeholder Exploration of Adversarial Dynamics in Synthetic Media
- Could you become more credible by being White? Assessing Impact of Race on Credibility with Deepfakes
Cited by in corpus (12)
- When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Deepfake Detection by Human Crowds, Machines, and Machine-informed Crowds
- Warning: Humans Cannot Reliably Detect Speech Deepfakes
- AI-enhanced Collective Intelligence
- Human Perception of Audio Deepfakes
- Non-Consensual Synthetic Intimate Imagery: Prevalence, Attitudes, and Knowledge in 10 Countries
- Merging AI Incidents Research with Political Misinformation Research: Introducing the Political Deepfakes Incidents Database
- As Good As A Coin Toss: Human detection of AI-generated images, videos, audio, and audiovisual stimuli
- Addressing contingency in algorithmic (mis)information classification: Toward a responsible machine learning agenda
- Can deepfakes be created by novice users?
- Exploring Saliency Bias in Manipulation Detection
- LEAP: LLM-powered End-to-end Automatic Library for Processing Social Science Queries on Unstructured Data