Quantifying the Classification of Exoplanets: in Search for the Right Habitability Metric
arXiv:2104.02991 · doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00211-z
Abstract
What is habitability? Can we quantify it? What do we mean under the term habitable or potentially habitable planet? With estimates of the number of planets in our Galaxy alone running into billions, possibly a number greater than the number of stars, it is high time to start characterizing them, sorting them into classes/types just like stars, to better understand their formation paths, their properties and, ultimately, their ability to beget or sustain life. After all, we do have life thriving on one of these billions of planets, why not on others? Which planets are better suited for life and which ones are definitely not worth spending expensive telescope time on? We need to find sort of quick assessment score, a metric, using which we can make a list of promising planets and dedicate our efforts to them. Exoplanetary habitability is a transdisciplinary subject integrating astrophysics, astrobiology, planetary science, even terrestrial environmental sciences. We review the existing metrics of habitability and the new classification schemes of extrasolar planets and provide an exposition of the use of computational intelligence techniques to evaluate habitability scores and to automate the process of classification of exoplanets. We examine how solving convex optimization techniques, as in computing new metrics such as CDHS and CEESA, cross-validates ML-based classification of exoplanets. Despite the recent criticism of exoplanetary habitability ranking, this field has to continue and evolve to use all available machinery of astroinformatics, artificial intelligence and machine learning. It might actually develop into a sort of same scale as stellar types in astronomy, to be used as a quick tool of screening exoplanets in important characteristics in search for potentially habitable planets for detailed follow-up targets.
arXiv comment17 pages, 6 figures, in press
References in corpus (25)
- Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler, III: Analysis of the First 16 Months of Data
- Prevalence of Earth-size planets orbiting Sun-like stars
- Unbound or Distant Planetary Mass Population Detected by Gravitational Microlensing
- The Climate of Early Mars
- Hybrid Forecasting of Chaotic Processes: Using Machine Learning in Conjunction with a Knowledge-Based Model
- Fast Radio Burst 121102 Pulse Detection and Periodicity: A Machine Learning Approach
- The Occurrence of Rocky Habitable Zone Planets Around Solar-Like Stars from Kepler Data
- Disequilibrium biosignatures over Earth history and implications for detecting exoplanet life
- Characterizing the Cool KOIs IV: Kepler-32 as a prototype for the formation of compact planetary systems throughout the Galaxy
- Bayesian analysis of the astrobiological implications of life's early emergence on Earth
- Searching the Entirety of Kepler Data. II. Occurrence Rate Estimates for FGK Stars
- Superhabitable Worlds
- The habitability of super-Earths in Gliese 581
- The Exoplanet Orbital Eccentricity - Multiplicity Relation and the Solar System
- The search for habitable worlds: 1. The viability of a starshade mission
- A Limited Habitable Zone for Complex Life
- The Habitable Epoch of the Early Universe
- Detectability of Life Using Oxygen on Pelagic Planets and Water Worlds
- The language of exoplanet ranking metrics needs to change
- Why do we find ourselves around a yellow star instead of a red star?
- Laboratory studies on the viability of life in H-dominated exoplanet atmospheres
- Evolution of Novel Activation Functions in Neural Network Training with Applications to Classification of Exoplanets
- Age Aspects of Habitability
- Statistical-likelihood Exo-Planetary Habitability Index (SEPHI)
- Similarity indexing of exoplanets in search for potential habitability: application to Mars-like worlds