Evolved Massive Stars at Low-metallicity IV. Using 1.6 m "H-bump" to identify red supergiant stars: a case study of NGC 6822
arXiv:2101.08689 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039596
Abstract
We present a case study of using a novel method to identify red supergiant (RSG) candidates in NGC 6822, based on their 1.6 m "H-bump". We collected 32 bands of photometric data for NGC 6822 ranging from optical to MIR. By using the theoretical spectra from MARCS, we demonstrate that there is a prominent difference around 1.6 m ("H-bump") between low-surface-gravity (LSG) and high-surface-gravity (HSG) targets. Taking advantage of this feature, we identify efficient color-color diagrams (CCDs) of rzH and rzK to separate HSG and LSG targets from crossmatching of optical and NIR data. Moreover, synthetic photometry from ATLAS9 also give similar results. Further separating RSG candidates from the rest of the LSG candidates is done by using semi-empirical criteria on NIR CMDs and resulted in 323 RSG candidates. Meanwhile, the simulation of foreground stars from Besançon models also indicates that our selection criteria is largely free from the contamination of Galactic giants. In addition to the "H-bump" method, we also use the traditional BVR method as a comparison and/or supplement, by applying a slightly aggressive cut to select as much as possible RSG candidates (358 targets). Furthermore, the Gaia astrometric solution is used to constrain the sample, where 181 and 193 targets were selected from the "H-bump" and BVR method, respectively. The percentages of selected targets in both methods are similar as 60\%, indicating the comparable accuracy of the two methods. In total, there are 234 RSG candidates after combining targets from both methods with 140 (60\%) of them in common. The final RSG candidates are in the expected locations on the MIR CMDs, while the spatial distribution is also coincident with the FUV-selected star formation regions, suggesting the selection is reasonable and reliable.
A&A accepted
References in corpus (21)
- The Gaia mission
- A grid of MARCS model atmospheres for late-type stars I. Methods and general properties
- The UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS)
- The Optical to Mid-Infrared Extinction Law Based on the APOGEE, Gaia DR2, Pan-STARRS1, SDSS, APASS, 2MASS and WISE Surveys
- The UKIRT Wide Field Camera ZYJHK Photometric System: Calibration from 2MASS
- The Effective Temperatures and Physical Properties of Magellanic Cloud Red Supergiants: The Effects of Metallicity
- The Spitzer Deep, Wide-Field Survey
- The UKIRT Hemisphere Survey: Definition and J-band Data Release
- The impact of mass-loss on the evolution and pre-supernova properties of red supergiants
- AGB stars in the Magellanic Clouds. II. The rate of star formation across the LMC
- Red Supergiant Stars as Cosmic Abundance Probes: KMOS Observations in NGC 6822
- The Period-Luminosity Relation of Red Supergiant Stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud
- A new survey of cool supergiants in the Magellanic Clouds
- Red Supergiant Stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud: I. The Period-Luminosity Relation
- Red Supergiants as Cosmic Abundance Probes: massive star clusters in M83, and the mass-metallicity relation of nearby galaxies
- A New Cepheid Distance Measurement and Method for NGC 6822
- Red Supergiants in M31 and M33 I. The Complete Sample
- Evolved Massive Stars at Low-metallicity III. A Source Catalog for the Large Magellanic Cloud
- Evolved Massive Stars at Low-metallicity II. Red Supergiant Stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud
- A state-of-the-art analysis of the dwarf irregular galaxy NGC 6822
- The Infrared Massive Stellar Content of M83
Cited by in corpus (5)
- Evolved Massive Stars at Low-metallicity V. Mass-Loss Rate of Red Supergiant Stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud
- Investigating the metallicity dependence of the mass-loss rate relation of red supergiants
- Gaia DR3 and nearby galaxies: where do foregrounds matter?
- Red Supergiants in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
- Locating Red Supergiants in the Galaxy NGC 6822