The evolution of trust and trustworthiness
arXiv:2008.12948 · doi:10.1098/rsif.2020.0491
Abstract
Trust and trustworthiness form the basis for continued social and economic interactions, and they are also fundamental for cooperation, fairness, honesty, and indeed for many other forms of prosocial and moral behavior. However, trust entails risks, and building a trustworthy reputation requires effort. So how did trust and trustworthiness evolve, and under which conditions do they thrive? To find answers, we operationalize trust and trustworthiness using the trust game with the trustor's investment and the trustee's return of the investment as the two key parameters. We study this game on different networks, including the complete network, random and scale-free networks, and in the well-mixed limit. We show that in all but one case the network structure has little effect on the evolution of trust and trustworthiness. Specifically, for well-mixed populations, lattices, random and scale-free networks, we find that trust never evolves, while trustworthiness evolves with some probability depending on the game parameters and the updating dynamics. Only for the scale-free network with degree non-normalized dynamics, we find parameter values for which trust evolves but trustworthiness does not, as well as values for which both trust and trustworthiness evolve. We conclude with a discussion about mechanisms that could lead to the evolution of trust and outline directions for future work.
9 two-column pages, 7 figures; accepted for publication in Journal of the Royal Society Interface
References in corpus (13)
- Statistical physics of social dynamics
- Statistical physics of human cooperation
- Statistical physics of vaccination
- Co-evolution of strategy and structure in complex networks with dynamical linking
- Dynamical Organization of Cooperation in Complex Topologies
- Evolutionary establishment of moral and double moral standards through spatial interactions
- Statistical physics of crime: A review
- Defense mechanisms of empathetic players in the spatial ultimatum game
- Evolutionary advantages of adaptive rewarding
- The effect of the topology on the spatial ultimatum game
- Accuracy in strategy imitations promotes the evolution of fairness in the spatial ultimatum game
- Evolution of cooperation driven by zealots
- Critical behavior in an evolutionary Ultimatum Game