Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview
arXiv:2008.04649
Abstract
Quantifying success in science plays a key role in guiding funding allocations, recruitment decisions, and rewards. Recently, a significant amount of progresses have been made towards quantifying success in science. This lack of detailed analysis and summary continues a practical issue. The literature reports the factors influencing scholarly impact and evaluation methods and indices aimed at overcoming this crucial weakness. We focus on categorizing and reviewing the current development on evaluation indices of scholarly impact, including paper impact, scholar impact, and journal impact. Besides, we summarize the issues of existing evaluation methods and indices, investigate the open issues and challenges, and provide possible solutions, including the pattern of collaboration impact, unified evaluation standards, implicit success factor mining, dynamic academic network embedding, and scholarly impact inflation. This paper should help the researchers obtaining a broader understanding of quantifying success in science, and identifying some potential research directions.
References in corpus (8)
- Universality of citation distributions: towards an objective measure of scientific impact
- Finding Scientific Gems with Google
- Ranking Scientific Publications Using a Simple Model of Network Traffic
- Collective credit allocation in science
- Career on the Move: Geography, Stratification, and Scientific Impact
- Scientific Article Recommendation: Exploiting Common Author Relations and Historical Preferences
- Unraveling the dynamics of growth, aging and inflation for citations to scientific articles from specific research fields
- Axiomatic Quantification of Co-authors' Relative Contributions