Note on arXiv:2005.05301, 'Preparation of the Neutrino-4 experiment on search for sterile neutrino and the obtained results of measurements'

Abstract

We comment on the claimed observation [arXiv:arXiv:2005.05301] of sterile neutrino oscillations by the Neutrino-4 collaboration. Such a claim, which requires the existence of a new fundamental particle, demands a level of rigor commensurate with its impact. The burden lies with the Neutrino-4 collaboration to provide the information necessary to prove the validity of their claim to the community. In this note, we describe aspects of both the data and analysis method that might lead to an oscillation signature arising from a null experiment and describe additional information needed from the Neutrino-4 collaboration to support the oscillation claim. Additionally, as opposed to the assertion made by the Neutrino-4 collaboration, we also show that the method of 'coherent summation' using the $L/E$ parameter produces similar results to the methods used by the PROSPECT and the STEREO collaborations.

arXiv comment5 pages, 3 figures

References in corpus (5)

• A Unified Approach to the Classical Statistical Analysis of Small Signals
• On the determination of anti-neutrino spectra from nuclear reactors
• First search for short-baseline neutrino oscillations at HFIR with PROSPECT
• Improved Sterile Neutrino Constraints from the STEREO Experiment with 179 Days of Reactor-On Data
• Online Monitoring of the Osiris Reactor with the Nucifer Neutrino Detector

Cited by in corpus (2)

• Experiment Neutrino-4 search for sterile neutrino and results of measurements
• Neutrino-4 anomaly: oscillations or fluctuations?