A novel approach for identifying and addressing case-mix heterogeneity in individual participant data meta-analysis

Abstract

Case-mix heterogeneity across studies complicates meta-analyses. As a result of this, treatments that are equally effective on patient subgroups may appear to have different effectiveness on patient populations with different case mix. It is therefore important that meta-analyses be explicit for what patient population they describe the treatment effect. To achieve this, we develop a new approach for meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, which use individual patient data (IPD) from all trials to infer the treatment effect for the patient population in a given trial, based on direct standardization using either outcome regression (OCR) or inverse probability weighting (IPW). Accompanying random-effect meta-analysis models are developed. The new approach enables disentangling heterogeneity due to case mix from that due to beyond case-mix reasons.

Published on Research Synthesis Methods

References in corpus (1)

• A novel approach for identifying and addressing case-mix heterogeneity in individual participant data meta-analysis

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Parametric G-computation for Compatible Indirect Treatment Comparisons with Limited Individual Patient Data
• A novel approach for identifying and addressing case-mix heterogeneity in individual participant data meta-analysis
• CausalMetaR: An R package for performing causally interpretable meta-analyses
• Model-based standardization using multiple imputation
• A framework for meta-analysis through standardized survival curves