Analog Errors in Quantum Annealing: Doom and Hope

Abstract

Quantum annealing has the potential to provide a speedup over classical algorithms in solving optimization problems. Just as for any other quantum device, suppressing Hamiltonian control errors will be necessary before quantum annealers can achieve speedups. Such analog control errors are known to lead to $J$-chaos, wherein the probability of obtaining the optimal solution, encoded as the ground state of the intended Hamiltonian, varies widely depending on the control error. Here, we show that $J$-chaos causes a catastrophic failure of quantum annealing, in that the scaling of the time-to-solution metric becomes worse than that of a deterministic (exhaustive) classical solver. We demonstrate this empirically using random Ising spin glass problems run on the two latest generations of the D-Wave quantum annealers. We then proceed to show that this doomsday scenario can be mitigated using a simple error suppression and correction scheme known as quantum annealing correction (QAC). By using QAC, the time-to-solution scaling of the same D-Wave devices is improved to below that of the classical upper bound, thus restoring hope in the speedup prospects of quantum annealing.

16 pages, 16 figures

References in corpus (11)

• Bounds for the adiabatic approximation with applications to quantum computation
• How Powerful is Adiabatic Quantum Computation?
• Reverse annealing for the fully connected $p$-spin model
• Quantum annealing correction for random Ising problems
• Exponential Speedup of Quantum Annealing by Inhomogeneous Driving of the Transverse Field
• Temperature and Disorder Chaos in Three-Dimensional Ising Spin Glasses
• The quantum adiabatic algorithm and scaling of gaps at first order quantum phase transitions
• Quantum annealing of the $p$-spin model under inhomogeneous transverse field driving
• Role of Non-stoquastic Catalysts in Quantum Adiabatic Optimization
• Quantum annealing correction at finite temperature: ferromagnetic $p$-spin models
• Scalable effective temperature reduction for quantum annealers via nested quantum annealing correction

Cited by in corpus (1)

• Noise Dynamics of Quantum Annealers: Estimating the Effective Noise Using Idle Qubits