Homeostatic plasticity and external input shape neural network dynamics

Abstract

In vitro and in vivo spiking activity clearly differ. Whereas networks in vitro develop strong bursts separated by periods of very little spiking activity, in vivo cortical networks show continuous activity. This is puzzling considering that both networks presumably share similar single-neuron dynamics and plasticity rules. We propose that the defining difference between in vitro and in vivo dynamics is the strength of external input. In vitro, networks are virtually isolated, whereas in vivo every brain area receives continuous input. We analyze a model of spiking neurons in which the input strength, mediated by spike rate homeostasis, determines the characteristics of the dynamical state. In more detail, our analytical and numerical results on various network topologies show consistently that under increasing input, homeostatic plasticity generates distinct dynamic states, from bursting, to close-to-critical, reverberating and irregular states. This implies that the dynamic state of a neural network is not fixed but can readily adapt to the input strengths. Indeed, our results match experimental spike recordings in vitro and in vivo: the in vitro bursting behavior is consistent with a state generated by very low network input (< 0.1%), whereas in vivo activity suggests that on the order of 1% recorded spikes are input-driven, resulting in reverberating dynamics. Importantly, this predicts that one can abolish the ubiquitous bursts of in vitro preparations, and instead impose dynamics comparable to in vivo activity by exposing the system to weak long-term stimulation, thereby opening new paths to establish an in vivo-like assay in vitro for basic as well as neurological studies.

14 pages, 8 figures, accepted at Phys. Rev. X

References in corpus (8)

• Dynamical synapses causing self-organized criticality in neural networks
• Self-Organized Criticality model for Brain Plasticity
• Astrocytes: orchestrating synaptic plasticity?
• Landau-Ginzburg theory of cortex dynamics: Scale-free avalanches emerge at the edge of synchronization
• Subsampling scaling: a theory about inference from partly observed systems
• Neutral theory and scale-free neural dynamics
• Self-Organized Supercriticality and Oscillations in Networks of Stochastic Spiking Neurons
• Simultaneous multi-patch-clamp and extracellular-array recordings: Single neuron reflects network activity

Cited by in corpus (18)

• Self-organization toward criticality by synaptic plasticity
• Feedback mechanisms for self-organization to the edge of a phase transition
• Universality in driven open quantum matter
• Growing Critical: Self-Organized Criticality in a Developing Neural System
• Hybrid-type synchronization transitions: where marginal coherence, scale-free avalanches, and bistability live together
• Dynamic Adaptive Computation: Tuning network states to task requirements
• Criticality in spreading processes without time-scale separation and the critical brain hypothesis
• Assessing criticality in pre-seizure single-neuron activity of human epileptic cortex
• Description of spreading dynamics by microscopic network models and macroscopic branching processes can differ due to coalescence
• Self-organized criticality in neural networks from activity-based rewiring
• Tailored ensembles of neural networks optimize sensitivity to stimulus statistics
• Hydrodynamic stabilization of self-organized criticality in a driven Rydberg gas
• Control of seizure-like dynamics in neuronal populations with excitability adaptation related to ketogenic diet
• Dynamic regulation of resource transport induces criticality in interdependent networks of excitable units
• Scaling of causal neural avalanches in a neutral model
• Quantifying plasticity: a network-based framework linking structure to dynamical regimes
• Task learning through stimulation-induced plasticity in neural networks
• Controlling the spontaneous firing behavior of a neuron with astrocyte