Identifying Observables that can Differentiate Between Impulsive and Footpoint Heating: Time Lags and Intensity Ratios
arXiv:1806.05374 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad9fb
Abstract
Observations of coronal loops have identified several common loop characteristics, including that loops appear to cool and have higher than expected densities. Two potential heating scenarios have been suggested to explain these observations. One scenario is that the loops are heated by a series of small-scale impulsive heating events, or nanoflares. Another hypothesis is that the heating is quasi-steady and highly-stratified, i.e., ``footpoint heating'. The goal of this paper is to identify observables that can be used to differentiate between these two heating scenarios. For footpoint heating, we vary the heating magnitude and stratification, for impulsive heating, we vary the heating magnitude. We use one-dimensional hydrodynamic codes to calculate the resulting temperature and density evolution and expected lightcurves in four channels of AIA and one channel of XRT. We consider two principal diagnostics: the time lag between the appearance of the loop in two different channels, and the ratio of the peak intensities of the loop in the two channels. We find that 1) footpoint heating can predict longer time lags than impulsive heating, 2) footpoint heating can predict zero or negative time lags, 3) the intensity ratio expected from impulsive heating is confined to a narrow range, while footpoint heating predicts a wider range of intensity ratios, and 4) the range of temperatures expected in impulsive heating is broader than the range of temperatures expected in footpoint heating. This preliminary study identifies observables that may be useful in discriminating between heating models in future work.
References in corpus (8)
- The multi-thermal and multi-stranded nature of coronal rain
- On The Fourier And Wavelet Analysis Of Coronal Time Series
- Closed-Field Coronal Heating Driven by Wave Turbulence
- Long-Period Intensity Pulsations in Coronal Loops Explained by Thermal Non-Equilibrium Cycles
- Continuous upflows and sporadic downflows observed in active regions
- Patterns of Activity in a Global Model of a Solar Active Region
- Chromospheric Nanoflares as a Source of Coronal Plasma: II. Repeating Nanoflares
- Can Large Time Delays Observed in Light Curves of Coronal Loops be Explained by Impulsive Heating?
Cited by in corpus (15)
- The Solar Orbiter mission -- Science overview
- The Role of Asymmetries in Thermal Non-Equilibrium
- The Distinction Between Thermal Nonequilibrium and Thermal Instability
- IRIS observations of short-term variability in moss associated with transient hot coronal loops
- The effects of numerical resolution, heating timescales and background heating on thermal non-equilibrium in coronal loops
- Multi-scale observations of thermal non-equilibrium cycles in coronal loops
- Modelling the solar transition region using an adaptive conduction method
- Understanding Heating in Active Region Cores through Machine Learning I. Numerical Modeling and Predicted Observables
- EUV fine structure and variability associated with coronal rain revealed by Solar Orbiter/EUI HRIEUV and SPICE
- Geometric Assumptions in Hydrodynamic Modeling of Coronal and Flaring Loops
- The effects of driving time scales on coronal heating in a stratified atmosphere
- The effects of driving time scales on heating in a coronal arcade
- Modeling of Condensations in Coronal Loops Produced by Impulsive Heating
- Forward modelling of heating within a coronal arcade
- A fast multi-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic formulation of the transition region adaptive conduction (TRAC) method