A Statistical Comparison between Photospheric Vector Magnetograms Obtained by SDO/HMI and Hinode/SP
arXiv:1801.07374 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa97e3
Abstract
Since May 1, 2010, we have been able to study (almost) continuously the vector magnetic field in the Sun, thanks to two space-based observatories: the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) and Hinode. Both are equipped with instruments able to measure the Stokes parameters of Zeeman-induced polarization of photospheric line radiation. But the observation modes, the spectral lines, the spatial, spectral and temporal sampling, and even the inversion codes used to recover magnetic and thermodynamic information from the Stokes profiles are different. We compare the vector magnetic fields derived from observations with the HMI instrument on board SDO, with those observed by the SP instrument on Hinode. We have obtained relationships between components of magnetic vectors in the umbra, penumbra and plage observed in 14 maps of NOAA AR 11084. Importantly, we have transformed SP data into observables comparable to those of HMI, to explore possible influences of the different modes of operation of the two instruments, and the inversion schemes used to infer the magnetic fields. The assumed filling factor (fraction of each pixel containing a Zeeman signature) produces the most significant differences in derived magnetic properties, especially in the plage. The spectral and angular samplings have the next largest effects. We suggest to treat the disambiguation in the same way in the data provided by HMI and SP. That would make the relationship between the vector magnetic field recovered from these data stronger, what would favor the simultaneous or complementary use of both instruments.
35 pages, 10 figures, 20 tables
References in corpus (9)
- The Solar Optical Telescope for the Hinode Mission: An Overview
- The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) Vector Magnetic Field Pipeline: Overview and Performance
- The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) Vector Magnetic Field Pipeline: Optimization of the Spectral Line Inversion Code
- On the Formation Height of the SDO/HMI Fe 6173 Doppler Signal
- Inferring the magnetic field vector in the quiet Sun. I. Photon noise and Selection Criteria
- Comparison of inversion codes for polarized line formation in MHD simulations. I. Milne-Eddington codes
- Comment on "Resolving the 180-deg Ambiguity in Solar Vector Magnetic Field Data: Evaluating the Effects of Noise, Spatial Resolution, and Method Assumptions"
- Photon mean free paths, scattering, and ever-increasing telescope resolution
- Response to "Comment on `Resolving the 180deg Ambiguity in Solar Vector Magnetic Field Data: Evaluating the Effects of Noise, Spatial Resolution, and Method Assumptions'"
Cited by in corpus (12)
- Magnetic properties of a long-lived sunspot - Vertical magnetic field at the umbral boundary
- Magnetic fields inferred by Solar Orbiter: A comparison between SO/PHI-HRT and SDO/HMI
- SynthIA: A Synthetic Inversion Approximation for the Stokes Vector Fusing SDO and Hinode into a Virtual Observatory
- Accuracy analysis of the on-board data reduction pipeline for the Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager on the Solar Orbiter mission
- Characterization of magneto-convection in sunspots -- The Gough & Tayler stability criterion in MURaM sunspot simulations
- On Identifying and Mitigating Bias in Inferred Measurements for Solar Vector Magnetic Field Data
- Magnetic Properties and Flow Angle of the Inverse Evershed Flow at Its Downflow Points
- Limitations and biases in the retrieval of the polar magnetic field I: the role of the magnetic filling factor in Milne-Eddington inversions of simulated Hinode/SP data
- Characterization of the umbra-penumbra boundary by the vertical component of the magnetic field -- Analysis of ground-based data from the GREGOR Infrared Spectrograph
- Large-Scale Spatial Cross-Calibration of Hinode/SOT-SP and SDO/HMI
- Clarifying Physical Properties of Magnetic Fields in Sunspots
- Chirality and magnetic configuration associated with two-ribbon solar flares: AR 10930 versus AR 11158