Reply to Comment on "Particle Path Through a Nested Mach-Zehnder Interferometer"
arXiv:1712.01895 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.97.026102
Abstract
While much of the technical analysis in the preceding Comment [1] is correct, in the end it confirms the conclusion reached in my previous work [2]: a consistent histories analysis provides no support for the claim of counterfactual quantum communication put forward in [3]
2 pages. v2: Abstract and journal reference for the published Comment to which this is a Reply have been added
References in corpus (4)
Cited by in corpus (10)
- Exchange-Free Computation on an Unknown Qubit at a Distance
- How Quantum is Quantum Counterfactual Communication?
- Weak values and the past of a quantum particle
- Deterministic Teleportation and Universal Computation Without Particle Exchange
- From Counterportation to Local Wormholes
- Three approaches for analyzing the counterfactuality of counterfactual protocols
- Counterfactuality, back-action, and information gain in multi-path interferometers
- Angular Momentum Flows without anything carrying it
- Realizing the "fictitious" beam splitter -- A stationary implementation of semi-counterfactual interaction-free imaging
- Interplay between strong and weak measurement: Comparison of three experimental approaches to weak value estimation