Comment on "Particle Path Through a Nested Mach-Zehnder Interferometer"
arXiv:1608.01640 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.97.026101
Abstract
In a recent paper, arXiv:1604.04596, Griffiths questioned - based on an informative consistent-histories (CH) argument - the counterfactuality, for one of the bit choices, of Salih et al.'s protocol for communicating without sending physical particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 170502 (2013). Here, we first show that for the Mach-Zehnder version used to explain our protocol, no family of consistent histories exists where any history has the photon travelling through the communication channel, thus rendering the question of whether the photon was in the communication channel meaningless from a CH viewpoint. We then show that for the actual Michelson-type protocol, there are consistent-histories families that include histories where the photon travels through the communication channel. We show that the probability of finding the photon in the communication channel is zero - thus proving complete counterfactuality.
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (12)
- Comment on "Past of a quantum particle revisited"
- Exchange-Free Computation on an Unknown Qubit at a Distance
- How Quantum is Quantum Counterfactual Communication?
- Weak values and the past of a quantum particle
- The laws of physics do not prohibit counterfactual communication
- Deterministic Teleportation and Universal Computation Without Particle Exchange
- From Counterportation to Local Wormholes
- Reply to Comment on "Particle Path Through a Nested Mach-Zehnder Interferometer"
- Three approaches for analyzing the counterfactuality of counterfactual protocols
- Counterfactuality, back-action, and information gain in multi-path interferometers
- Angular Momentum Flows without anything carrying it
- Realizing the "fictitious" beam splitter -- A stationary implementation of semi-counterfactual interaction-free imaging