Galaxy And Mass Assembly: Automatic Morphological Classification of Galaxies Using Statistical Learning

Abstract

We apply four statistical learning methods to a sample of $7941$ galaxies ($z<0.06$) from the Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey to test the feasibility of using automated algorithms to classify galaxies. Using $10$ features measured for each galaxy (sizes, colours, shape parameters \& stellar mass) we apply the techniques of Support Vector Machines (SVM), Classification Trees (CT), Classification Trees with Random Forest (CTRF) and Neural Networks (NN), returning True Prediction Ratios (TPRs) of $75.8\%$, $69.0\%$, $76.2\%$ and $76.0\%$ respectively. Those occasions whereby all four algorithms agree with each other yet disagree with the visual classification (`unanimous disagreement') serves as a potential indicator of human error in classification, occurring in $\sim 9\%$ of ellipticals, $\sim 9\%$ of Little Blue Spheroids, $\sim 14\%$ of early-type spirals, $\sim 21\%$ of intermediate-type spirals and $\sim 4\%$ of late-type spirals \& irregulars. We observe that the choice of parameters rather than that of algorithms is more crucial in determining classification accuracy. Due to its simplicity in formulation and implementation, we recommend the CTRF algorithm for classifying future galaxy datasets. Adopting the CTRF algorithm, the TPRs of the 5 galaxy types are : E, $70.1\%$; LBS, $75.6\%$; S0-Sa, $63.6\%$; Sab-Scd, $56.4\%$ and Sd-Irr, $88.9\%$. Further, we train a binary classifier using this CTRF algorithm that divides galaxies into spheroid-dominated (E, LBS \& S0-Sa) and disk-dominated (Sab-Scd \& Sd-Irr), achieving an overall accuracy of $89.8\%$. This translates into an accuracy of $84.9\%$ for spheroid-dominated systems and $92.5\%$ for disk-dominated systems.

arXiv comment30 pages, 21 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS

References in corpus (47)

• Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003
• The Seventh Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
• The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Spectra and redshifts
• Galaxy Harassment and the Evolution of Clusters of Galaxies
• The Sixth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
• Galaxy Zoo : Morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
• Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): survey diagnostics and core data release
• The Multi-Object, Fiber-Fed Spectrographs for SDSS and the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey
• Galaxy bimodality versus stellar mass and environment
• The Relationship Between Stellar Light Distributions of Galaxies and their Formation Histories
• Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology prediction
• The Origin of Star Formation Gradients in Rich Galaxy Clusters
• Galaxy And Mass Assembly: Stellar Mass Estimates
• Galaxy Zoo: the dependence of morphology and colour on environment
• Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): end of survey report and data release 2
• On the Estimation of Confidence Intervals for Binomial Population Proportions in Astronomy: The Simplicity and Superiority of the Bayesian Approach
• Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Structural Investigation of Galaxies via Model Analysis (SIGMA)
• Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): mass-size relations of z$<$0.1 galaxies subdivided by Sérsic index, colour and morphology
• The Millennium Galaxy Catalogue: morphological classification and bimodality in the colour-concentration plane
• A catalog of visual-like morphologies in the 5 CANDELS fields using deep-learning
• Evolution Since z=1 of the Morphology-density Relation of Galaxies
• Tidal Shocking by Extended Mass Distributions
• Tidal Effects in Clusters of Galaxies
• The Spatial and Kinematic Distributions of Cluster Galaxies in a LCDM Universe -- Comparison with Observations
• Galaxy Zoo: Reproducing Galaxy Morphologies Via Machine Learning
• Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Spectroscopic analysis
• Dynamical Evolution of Galaxies in Clusters
• The Millennium Galaxy Catalogue: the space density and surface brightness distribution(s) of galaxies
• A Catalog of Morphological Types in 10 Distant Rich Clusters of Galaxies
• Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): autoz spectral redshift measurements, confidence and errors
• Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Stellar mass functions by Hubble type
• Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): FUV, NUV, ugrizYJHK Petrosian, Kron and Sèrsic photometry
• The Dependence of Galaxy Morphology and Structure on Environment and Stellar Mass
• An H alpha Survey of 8 Abell Clusters: the dependence of tidally-induced star formation on cluster density
• Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): The 0.013 < z < 0.1 cosmic spectral energy distribution from 0.1 micron to 1mm
• Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): the Stellar Mass Budget by Galaxy Type
• Galaxy Light Concentration. I. Index stability and the connection with galaxy structure, dynamics, and supermassive black holes
• Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): ugrizYJHK Sérsic luminosity functions and the cosmic spectral energy distribution by Hubble type
• Transformation of Morphology and Luminosity Classes of the SDSS Galaxies
• The Millennium Galaxy Catalogue: Exploring the Color-Concentration Bimodality via Bulge-Disc Decomposition
• Explaining the reportedly over-massive black holes in early-type galaxies with intermediate-scale discs
• Using Oblique Decision Trees for the Morphological Classification of Galaxies
• Spatially Resolved Galaxy Star Formation and its Environmental Dependence I
• Disky elliptical galaxies and the allegedly over-massive black hole in the compact massive `ES' galaxy NGC 1271
• Machine Learning for Galaxy Morphology Classification
• Mathematical Morphology: Star/Galaxy Differentiation & Galaxy Morphology Classification
• Spatially Resolved Galaxy Star Formation and its Environmental Dependence II. Effect of the Morphology-Density Relation

Cited by in corpus (17)

• Optimising Automatic Morphological Classification of Galaxies with Machine Learning and Deep Learning using Dark Energy Survey Imaging
• Galaxy Morphological Classification Catalogue of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data with Convolutional Neural Networks
• Detecting outliers in astronomical images with deep generative networks
• Morphological classification of galaxies with deep learning: comparing 3-way and 4-way CNNs
• Machine learning technique for morphological classification of galaxies from the SDSS. I. Photometry-based approach
• Efficient Selection of Quasar Candidates Based on Optical and Infrared Photometric Data Using Machine Learning
• A galaxy classification grid that better recognises early-type galaxy morphology
• Relating the structure of dark matter halos to their assembly and environment
• Identifying Galaxy Mergers in Simulated CEERS NIRCam Images using Random Forests
• Galaxy classification: deep learning on the OTELO and COSMOS databases
• PSFGAN: a generative adversarial network system for separating quasar point sources and host galaxy light
• Sky Subtraction in an Era of Low Surface Brightness Astronomy
• Protostellar classification using supervised machine learning algorithms
• Galaxy classification: A machine learning analysis of GAMA catalogue data
• Galaxy Image Classification using Hierarchical Data Learning with Weighted Sampling and Label Smoothing
• Machine learning technique for morphological classification of galaxies from the SDSS. III. Image-based inference of detailed features
• An efficient unsupervised classification model for galaxy morphology: Voting clustering based on coding from ConvNeXt large model