Galaxy And Mass Assembly: Automatic Morphological Classification of Galaxies Using Statistical Learning

Abstract

We apply four statistical learning methods to a sample of $7941$ galaxies ($z<0.06$) from the Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey to test the feasibility of using automated algorithms to classify galaxies. Using $10$ features measured for each galaxy (sizes, colours, shape parameters \& stellar mass) we apply the techniques of Support Vector Machines (SVM), Classification Trees (CT), Classification Trees with Random Forest (CTRF) and Neural Networks (NN), returning True Prediction Ratios (TPRs) of $75.8\%$, $69.0\%$, $76.2\%$ and $76.0\%$ respectively. Those occasions whereby all four algorithms agree with each other yet disagree with the visual classification (`unanimous disagreement') serves as a potential indicator of human error in classification, occurring in $\sim 9\%$ of ellipticals, $\sim 9\%$ of Little Blue Spheroids, $\sim 14\%$ of early-type spirals, $\sim 21\%$ of intermediate-type spirals and $\sim 4\%$ of late-type spirals \& irregulars. We observe that the choice of parameters rather than that of algorithms is more crucial in determining classification accuracy. Due to its simplicity in formulation and implementation, we recommend the CTRF algorithm for classifying future galaxy datasets. Adopting the CTRF algorithm, the TPRs of the 5 galaxy types are : E, $70.1\%$; LBS, $75.6\%$; S0-Sa, $63.6\%$; Sab-Scd, $56.4\%$ and Sd-Irr, $88.9\%$. Further, we train a binary classifier using this CTRF algorithm that divides galaxies into spheroid-dominated (E, LBS \& S0-Sa) and disk-dominated (Sab-Scd \& Sd-Irr), achieving an overall accuracy of $89.8\%$. This translates into an accuracy of $84.9\%$ for spheroid-dominated systems and $92.5\%$ for disk-dominated systems.

30 pages, 21 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS

References in corpus (11)

• Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology prediction
• Galaxy Zoo: the dependence of morphology and colour on environment
• Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): autoz spectral redshift measurements, confidence and errors
• Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Stellar mass functions by Hubble type
• The Dependence of Galaxy Morphology and Structure on Environment and Stellar Mass
• Transformation of Morphology and Luminosity Classes of the SDSS Galaxies
• The Millennium Galaxy Catalogue: Exploring the Color-Concentration Bimodality via Bulge-Disc Decomposition
• Spatially Resolved Galaxy Star Formation and its Environmental Dependence I
• Disky elliptical galaxies and the allegedly over-massive black hole in the compact massive `ES' galaxy NGC 1271
• Machine Learning for Galaxy Morphology Classification
• Spatially Resolved Galaxy Star Formation and its Environmental Dependence II. Effect of the Morphology-Density Relation

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Galaxy Morphological Classification Catalogue of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data with Convolutional Neural Networks
• Efficient Selection of Quasar Candidates Based on Optical and Infrared Photometric Data Using Machine Learning
• A galaxy classification grid that better recognises early-type galaxy morphology
• Galaxy classification: deep learning on the OTELO and COSMOS databases