How social information can improve estimation accuracy in human groups

Abstract

In our digital and connected societies, the development of social networks, online shopping, and reputation systems raises the question of how individuals use social information, and how it affects their decisions. We report experiments performed in France and Japan, in which subjects could update their estimates after having received information from other subjects. We measure and model the impact of this social information at individual and collective scales. We observe and justify that when individuals have little prior knowledge about a quantity, the distribution of the logarithm of their estimates is close to a Cauchy distribution. We find that social influence helps the group improve its properly defined collective accuracy. We quantify the improvement of the group estimation when additional controlled and reliable information is provided, unbeknownst to the subjects. We show that subjects' sensitivity to social influence permits to define five robust behavioral traits and increases with the difference between personal and group estimates. We then use our data to build and calibrate a model of collective estimation, to analyze the impact on the group performance of the quantity and quality of information received by individuals. The model quantitatively reproduces the distributions of estimates and the improvement of collective performance and accuracy observed in our experiments. Finally, our model predicts that providing a moderate amount of incorrect information to individuals can counterbalance the human cognitive bias to systematically underestimate quantities, and thereby improve collective performance.

arXiv commentSupporting info is available at this link http://www.lpt.ups-tlse.fr/spip.php?action=acceder_document&arg=2289&cle=49c4162cc44289dd0c56d9b67488c0d04a686ff0&file=pdf%2FJayles_et_al_SupportInfo_Appendix.pdf

References in corpus (3)

• Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation
• Modelling influence and opinion evolution in online collective behaviour
• Social influence makes self-interested crowds smarter: an optimal control perspective

Cited by in corpus (10)

• Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks
• Emergence of polarized ideological opinions in multidimensional topic spaces
• Transitions between polarization and radicalization in a temporal bilayer echo chambers model
• The cost of coordination can exceed the benefit of collaboration in performing complex tasks
• Impact of sharing full versus averaged social information on social influence and estimation accuracy
• Exploring the foundation of social diversity and coherence with a novel attraction-repulsion model framework
• Crowd control: Reducing individual estimation bias by sharing biased social information
• Network Structures of Collective Intelligence: The Contingent Benefits of Group Discussion
• The Wisdom and Persuadability of Threads
• Dynamical-System Model Predicts When Social Learners Impair Collective Performance