The isolation of Luminous Blue Variables: On subdividing the sample

Abstract

A debate has arisen concerning the fundamental nature of LBVs) and their role in stellar evolution. While Smith and Tombleson proposed that their isolated environments indicate that LBVs must be largely the product of binary evolution, Humphreys et al. have recently expressed the view that the traditional single-star view still holds if one appropriately selects a subsample of LBVs. This paper finds the claim of Humphreys et al. to be quantitatively unjustified. A statistical test of "candidate" as opposed to "confirmed" LBVs shows no significant difference ($<$1$\sigma$) between their environments. Even if the sample is further subdivided as proposed, the three most luminous LBVs are spatially dispersed similar to late O-type dwarfs, which have much longer lifetimes than expected for classical LBVs. Lower-luminosity LBVs have a distribution associated with red supergiants (RSGs), but these RSGs are dominated by stars of 10-15 M${}_{\odot }$ initial mass, with much longer lifetimes than expected for those lower-luminosity LBVs. If one's view is restricted to the highest-luminosity LBVs, then the appropriate comparison is with early O-type stars that are their presumed progenitors, when this is done, it is clear that even the high-luminosity LBVs are more dispersed than expected. Humphreys et al. also suggest that velocities of LBVs support the single-star view, being inconsistent with runaways. A quantitative analysis of the radial velocity distribution of LBVS in M31 and M33 contradicts this, modest runway speeds expected from mass gainers in binary evolution are consistent with the observed velocities, although the data lack the precision to discriminate.

9 pages, 3 figs. Accepted/in press

References in corpus (6)

• Binary interaction dominates the evolution of massive stars
• Pre-Supernova Evolution of Massive Single and Binary Stars
• Southern Massive Stars at High Angular Resolution: Observational Campaign and Companion Detection
• Red supergiants as potential Type IIn supernova progenitors: Spatially resolved 4.6 micron CO emission around VY CMa and Betelgeuse
• Luminous Blue Variables are Antisocial: Their Isolation Implies that they are Kicked Mass Gainers in Binary Evolution
• On the role of the WNH phase in the evolution of very massive stars: Enabling the LBV instability with feedback

Cited by in corpus (13)

• A new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants
• The possible detection of a binary companion to a Type Ibn supernova progenitor
• Massive stars dying alone: The extremely remote environment of SN 2009ip
• A new and unusual LBV-like outburst from a Wolf-Rayet star in the outskirts of M33
• A Tale of Two Impostors: SN2002kg and SN1954J in NGC 2403
• A deep near-infrared spectroscopic survey of the Scutum-Crux arm for Wolf-Rayet stars
• Luminous Blue Variables
• Search for LBVs in the Local Volume galaxies: study of two stars in NGC 1156
• A warm molecular ring in AG Car: composing the mass-loss puzzle
• How long can LBVs sleep? A long-term photometric vaiability and spectral study of the Galactic candidate luminous blue variable MN112
• LBV phenomenon and binarity: The environment of HR Car
• On the spatial distribution of luminous blue variables in the M33 galaxy
• Kinematics of Wolf-Rayet Stars in the LMC: Clues to Subtype Origins