Assessing Learning Outcomes in Middle-Division Classical Mechanics: The Colorado Classical Mechanics/Math Methods Instrument

Abstract

Reliable and validated assessments of introductory physics have been instrumental in driving curricular and pedagogical reforms that lead to improved student learning. As part of an effort to systematically improve our sophomore-level Classical Mechanics and Math Methods course (CM 1) at CU Boulder, we have developed a tool to assess student learning of CM 1 concepts in the upper-division. The Colorado Classical Mechanics/Math Methods Instrument (CCMI) builds on faculty consensus learning goals and systematic observations of student difficulties. The result is a 9-question open-ended post-test that probes student learning in the first half of a two-semester classical mechanics / math methods sequence. In this paper, we describe the design and development of this instrument, its validation, and measurements made in classes at CU Boulder and elsewhere.

arXiv comment11 pages, 6 figures, 1 table

References in corpus (10)

• A Review of Student Difficulties in Upper-Level Quantum Mechanics
• Surveying students' understanding of quantum mechanics in one spatial dimension
• A Tale of Two Curricula: The performance of two thousand students in introductory electromagnetism
• Student Difficulties with Quantum Mechanics Formalism
• Analytic Framework for Students' Use of Mathematics in Upper-Division Physics
• Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
• Coupled Multiple-response vs. Free-response Conceptual assessment: An Example from upper-division Physics
• Student Understanding of Taylor Series Expansions in Statistical Mechanics
• Development and Uses of Upper-division Conceptual Assessment
• Research-Based Course Materials and Assessments for Upper-Division Electrodynamics (E&M II)