Investigating Bias in Maximum Likelihood Quantum State Tomography

Abstract

Maximum likelihood quantum state tomography yields estimators that are consistent, provided that the likelihood model is correct, but the maximum likelihood estimators may have bias for any finite data set. The bias of an estimator is the difference between the expected value of the estimate and the true value of the parameter being estimated. This paper investigates bias in the widely used maximum likelihood quantum state tomography. Our goal is to understand how the amount of bias depends on factors such as the purity of the true state, the number of measurements performed, and the number of different bases in which the system is measured. For that, we perform numerical experiments that simulate optical homodyne tomography under various conditions, perform tomography, and estimate bias in the purity of the estimated state. We find that estimates of higher purity states exhibit considerable bias, such that the estimates have lower purity than the true states.

New version where we fixed error in evenly spaced phases. Expanded analysis of evenly spaced phases. 8 figures. Submitted to Phys. Rev. A

References in corpus (8)

• Experimental Quantum State Tomography of Optical Fields and Ultrafast Statistical Sampling
• Diluted maximum-likelihood algorithm for quantum tomography
• Purity of Gaussian states: measurement schemes and time-evolution in noisy channels
• Practical, Reliable Error Bars in Quantum Tomography
• Robust error bars for quantum tomography
• Gradient-based stopping rules for maximum-likelihood quantum-state tomography
• Effect of nonnegativity on estimation errors in one-qubit state tomography with finite data
• Quantum state tomography: Mean squared error matters, bias does not

Cited by in corpus (13)

• Entanglement and teleportation between polarization and wave-like encodings of an optical qubit
• Certification of non-Gaussian states with operational measurements
• Continuous phase-space representations for finite-dimensional quantum states and their tomography
• Direct Fidelity Estimation of Quantum States using Machine Learning
• Deep learning of quantum entanglement from incomplete measurements
• Wigner tomography of multispin quantum states
• Joint Quantum-State and Measurement Tomography with Incomplete Measurements
• Experimental demonstration of selective quantum process tomography on an NMR quantum information processor
• Experimental quantum tomography assisted by multiply symmetric states in higher dimensions
• Enhancing quantum state tomography via resource-efficient attention-based neural networks
• Efficient factored gradient descent algorithm for quantum state tomography
• Ability of entanglement and purity to help to detect systematic experimental errors
• Three-qubit W state tomography via full and marginal state reconstructions on ibm_osaka