Effect of nonnegativity on estimation errors in one-qubit state tomography with finite data
arXiv:1205.2976 · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/8/085005
Abstract
We analyze the behavior of estimation errors evaluated by two loss functions, the Hilbert-Schmidt distance and infidelity, in one-qubit state tomography with finite data. We show numerically that there can be a large gap between the estimation errors and those predicted by an asymptotic analysis. The origin of this discrepancy is the existence of the boundary in the state space imposed by the requirement that density matrices be nonnegative (positive semidefinite). We derive an explicit form of a function reproducing the behavior of the estimation errors with high accuracy by introducing two approximations: a Gaussian approximation of the multinomial distributions of outcomes, and linearizing the boundary. This function gives us an intuition for the behavior of the expected losses for finite data sets. We show that this function can be used to determine the amount of data necessary for the estimation to be treated reliably with the asymptotic theory. We give an explicit expression for this amount, which exhibits strong sensitivity to the true quantum state as well as the choice of measurement.
9 pages, 4 figures, One figure (FIG. 1) is added to the previous version, and some typos are corrected
References in corpus (8)
- Experimental Quantum State Tomography of Optical Fields and Ultrafast Statistical Sampling
- Unknown Quantum States and Operations, a Bayesian View
- Quantum state estimation
- State estimation for large ensembles
- Choice of Measurement Sets in Qubit Tomography
- Collective vs local measurements in qubit mixed state estimation
- Adaptive experimental design for one-qubit state estimation with finite data based on a statistical update criterion
- Error probability analysis in quantum tomography: a tool for evaluating experiments
Cited by in corpus (8)
- Adaptive quantum state tomography improves accuracy quadratically
- Systematic errors in current quantum state tomography tools
- Joint Quantum-State and Measurement Tomography with Incomplete Measurements
- Bound entangled states fit for robust experimental verification
- Investigating Bias in Maximum Likelihood Quantum State Tomography
- Comparison of confidence regions for quantum state tomography
- Reliable Characterization for Improving and Validating Accurate Quantum Operations
- Ability of entanglement and purity to help to detect systematic experimental errors