Quantum transport at the Dirac point: Mapping out the minimum conductivity from pristine to disordered graphene
arXiv:1507.01257 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.205408
Abstract
The phase space for graphene's minimum conductivity is mapped out using Landauer theory modified for scattering using Fermi's Golden Rule, as well as the Non-Equilibrium Green's Function (NEGF) simulation with a Monte Carlo sampling over impurity distributions. The resulting `fan diagram' spans the range from ballistic to diffusive over varying aspect ratios (), and bears several surprises. {The device aspect ratio determines how much tunneling (between contacts) is allowed and becomes the dominant factor for the evolution of from ballistic to diffusive regime. We find an increasing (for ) or decreasing () trend in vs. impurity density, all converging around at the dirty limit}. In the diffusive limit, the {conductivity} quasi-saturates due to the precise cancellation between the increase in conducting modes from charge puddles vs the reduction in average transmission from scattering at the Dirac Point. In the clean ballistic limit, the calculated conductivity of the lowest mode shows a surprising absence of Fabry-Pérot oscillations, unlike other materials including bilayer graphene. We argue that the lack of oscillations even at low temperature is a signature of Klein tunneling.
References in corpus (11)
- Chiral tunneling and the Klein paradox in graphene
- Charged Impurity Scattering in Graphene
- A self-consistent theory for graphene transport
- Measurement of Scattering Rate and Minimum Conductivity in Graphene
- Quantum-limited shot noise in graphene
- Phase Coherent Transport of Charges in Graphene Quantum Billiard
- Minimal conductivity in bilayer graphene
- Conductivity and Fano factor in disordered graphene
- Insulating behavior at the neutrality point in dual-gated, single-layer graphene
- Crossover from quantum to Boltzmann transport in graphene
- Effect of short- and long-range scattering in the conductivity of graphene: Boltzmann approach vs tight-binding calculations