Dimensionless Units in the SI

Abstract

The International System of Units (SI) is supposed to be coherent. That is, when a combination of units is replaced by an equivalent unit, there is no additional numerical factor. Here we consider dimensionless units as defined in the SI, {\it e.g.} angular units like radians or steradians and counting units like radioactive decays or molecules. We show that an incoherence may arise when different units of this type are replaced by a single dimensionless unit, the unit "one", and suggest how to properly include such units into the SI in order to remove the incoherence. In particular, we argue that the radian is the appropriate coherent unit for angles and that hertz is not a coherent unit in the SI. We also discuss how including angular and counting units affects the fundamental constants.

19 pages

References in corpus (1)

• CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2010

Cited by in corpus (11)

• Calibration of free-space and fiber-coupled single-photon detectors
• Using math in physics -- 1. Dimensional analysis
• Angles are inherently neither length ratios nor dimensionless
• Implications of adopting plane angle as a base quantity in the SI
• On the status of plane and solid angles in the International System of Units (SI)
• True versus apparent shapes of bow shocks
• A clearer approach for defining unit systems
• Angles in the SI: treating the radian as an independent, unhidden unit does not require the redefinition of the term frequency or the unit hertz
• On the dimension of angles and their units
• Angles in the SI: a detailed proposal for solving the problem
• Generalized Einstein Relations between Absorption and Emission Spectra in the Electric-Dipole Approximation