Angles in the SI: a detailed proposal for solving the problem
arXiv:2108.05704 · doi:10.1088/1681-7575/ac023f
Abstract
A recent Letter proposed changing the dimensionless status of the radian and steradian within the SI, while allowing the continued use of the convention to set the angle 1 radian equal to the number 1 within equations, providing this is done explicitly. This would bring the advantages of a physics-based, consistent, and logically-robust unit system, with unambiguous units for all physical quantities, for the first time, while any upheaval to familiar equations and routine practice would be minimised. More details of this proposal are given here. The only notable changes for typical end-users would be: improved units for the quantities torque, angular momentum and moment of inertia; a statement of the convention accompanying some familiar equations; and the use of different symbols for h-bar the action and h-bar the angular momentum, a small step forward for quantum physics. Some features of the proposal are already established practice for quantities involving the steradian such as radiant intensity and radiance.
Accepted for publication by Metrologia
References in corpus (7)
- Dimensionless Units in the SI
- Angles are inherently neither length ratios nor dimensionless
- Implications of adopting plane angle as a base quantity in the SI
- On the status of plane and solid angles in the International System of Units (SI)
- The role of unit systems in expressing and testing the laws of nature
- Angles in the SI: treating the radian as an independent, unhidden unit does not require the redefinition of the term frequency or the unit hertz
- Solid angles in perspective