Evolution of bow-tie architectures in biology

Abstract

Bow-tie or hourglass structure is a common architectural feature found in biological and technological networks. A bow-tie in a multi-layered structure occurs when intermediate layers have much fewer components than the input and output layers. Examples include metabolism where a handful of building blocks mediate between multiple input nutrients and multiple output biomass components, and signaling networks where information from numerous receptor types passes through a small set of signaling pathways to regulate multiple output genes. Little is known, however, about how bow-tie architectures evolve. Here, we address the evolution of bow-tie architectures using simulations of multi-layered systems evolving to fulfill a given input-output goal. We find that bow-ties spontaneously evolve when two conditions are met: (i) the evolutionary goal is rank deficient, where the rank corresponds to the minimal number of input features on which the outputs depend, and (ii) The effects of mutations on interaction intensities between components are described by product rule - namely the mutated element is multiplied by a random number. Product-rule mutations are more biologically realistic than the commonly used sum-rule mutations that add a random number to the mutated element. These conditions robustly lead to bow-tie structures. The minimal width of the intermediate network layers (the waist or knot of the bow-tie) equals the rank of the evolutionary goal. These findings can help explain the presence of bow-ties in diverse biological systems, and can also be relevant for machine learning applications that employ multi-layered networks.

References in corpus (12)

• The information bottleneck method
• The evolutionary origins of modularity
• Information based clustering
• Optimizing information flow in small genetic networks. I
• Optimizing information flow in small genetic networks. II: Feed forward interactions
• Motifs emerge from function in model gene regulatory networks
• Propagation of large concentration changes in reversible protein binding networks
• Optimizing information flow in small genetic networks. III. A self-interacting gene
• Mutation Rules and the Evolution of Sparseness and Modularity in Biological Systems
• Funnel landscape and mutational robustness as a result of evolution under thermal noise
• Distribution of essential interactions in model gene regulatory networks under mutation-selection balance
• An explanatory evo-devo model for the developmental hourglass

Cited by in corpus (14)

• Geometry of environment-to-phenotype mapping: Unifying adaptation strategies in varying environments
• Green function of correlated genes in a minimal mechanical model of protein evolution
• Evolution of new regulatory functions on biophysically realistic fitness landscapes
• Proteins: the physics of amorphous evolving matter
• Dimensional Reduction in Complex Living Systems: Where, Why, and How
• Measuring Law Over Time: A Network Analytical Framework with an Application to Statutes and Regulations in the United States and Germany
• How higher goals are constructed and collapse under stress: a hierarchical Bayesian control systems perspective
• The self-referring DNA and protein: a remark on physical and geometrical aspects
• A system-wide network reconstruction of gene regulation and metabolism in Escherichia coli
• Soft Modes as a Predictive Framework for Low Dimensional Biological Systems across Scales
• An explanatory evo-devo model for the developmental hourglass
• The Core & Periphery Hypothesis: A Conceptual Basis for Generality in Cell and Developmental Biology
• Habitat variability does not generally promote metabolic network modularity in flies and mammals
• Circuit design in biology and machine learning. I. Random networks and dimensional reduction