Synthesizing Exoplanet Demographics from Radial Velocity and Microlensing Surveys, I: Methodology

Abstract

Motivated by the order-of-magnitude difference in the frequency of giant planets orbiting M dwarfs inferred by microlensing and radial velocity (RV) surveys, we present a method for comparing the statistical constraints on exoplanet demographics inferred from these methods. We first derive the mapping from the observable parameters of a microlensing-detected planet to those of an analogous planet orbiting an RV-monitored star. Using this mapping, we predict the distribution of RV observables for the planet population inferred from microlensing surveys, taking care to adopt reasonable priors for, and properly marginalize over, the unknown physical parameters of microlensing-detected systems. Finally, we use simple estimates of the detection limits for a fiducial RV survey to predict the number and properties of analogs of the microlensing planet population such an RV survey should detect. We find that RV and microlensing surveys have some overlap, specifically for super-Jupiter mass planets ($m_p\gtrsim 1M_{\mathrm{Jup}}$) with periods between $\sim 3-10$years. However, the steeply falling planetary mass function inferred from microlensing implies that, in this region of overlap, RV surveys should infer a much smaller frequency than the overall giant planet frequency ($m_p\gtrsim 0.1M_{\mathrm{Jup}}$) inferred by microlensing. Our analysis demonstrates that it is possible to statistically compare and synthesize data sets from multiple exoplanet detection techniques in order to infer exoplanet demographics over wider regions of parameter space than are accessible to individual methods. In a companion paper, we apply our methodology to several representative microlensing and RV surveys to derive the frequency of planets around M dwarfs with orbits of $\lesssim 30$years.

21 pages, 5 figures, part 1 of a 2-paper series submitted to ApJ. For a brief video summarizing this 2-paper series, please see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbNCWASAjsQ

References in corpus (9)

• The Occurrence and Mass Distribution of Close-in Super-Earths, Neptunes, and Jupiters
• Spectroscopic parameters for 451 stars in the HARPS GTO planet search program. Stellar [Fe/H] and the frequency of exo-Neptunes
• One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observations
• Planet formation around stars of various masses: The snow line and the frequency of giant planets
• Discovery of a Jupiter/Saturn Analog with Gravitational Microlensing
• Microlens OGLE-2005-BLG-169 Implies Cool Neptune-Like Planets are Common
• The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets. XIII. A planetary system with 3 Super-Earths (4.2, 6.9, & 9.2 Earth masses)
• MOA-cam3: a wide-field mosaic CCD camera for a gravitational microlensing survey in New Zealand
• Formation and Evolution of Planetary Systems: Upper Limits to the Gas Mass in Disks Around Sun-like Stars

Cited by in corpus (12)

• The Exoplanet Mass-Ratio Function from the MOA-II Survey: Discovery of a Break and Likely Peak at a Neptune Mass
• No massive black holes in the Milky Way halo
• Mid-to-Late M Dwarfs Lack Jupiter Analogs
• Constraining the Frequency of Free-Floating Planets from a Synthesis of Microlensing, Radial Velocity, and Direct Imaging Survey Results
• OGLE-2016-BLG-1190Lb: First Spitzer Bulge Planet Lies Near the Planet/Brown-Dwarf Boundary
• Limits on planetary-mass primordial black holes from the OGLE high-cadence survey of the Magellanic Clouds
• MOA-2007-BLG-400 A Super-Jupiter Mass Planet Orbiting a Galactic BulgeK-dwarf Revealed by Keck Adaptive Optics Imaging
• ExELS: an exoplanet legacy science proposal for the ESA Euclid mission. II. Hot exoplanets and sub-stellar systems
• The Demographics of Wide-Separation Planets
• Transits Probabilities Around Hypervelocity and Runaway Stars
• Combining Transit and RV: A Synthesized Population Model
• Exoplanet Occurrence Rates from Microlensing Surveys