Balancing Covariates via Propensity Score Weighting

Abstract

Covariate balance is crucial for unconfounded descriptive or causal comparisons. However, lack of balance is common in observational studies. This article considers weighting strategies for balancing covariates. We define a general class of weights---the balancing weights---that balance the weighted distributions of the covariates between treatment groups. These weights incorporate the propensity score to weight each group to an analyst-selected target population. This class unifies existing weighting methods, including commonly used weights such as inverse-probability weights as special cases. General large-sample results on nonparametric estimation based on these weights are derived. We further propose a new weighting scheme, the overlap weights, in which each unit's weight is proportional to the probability of that unit being assigned to the opposite group. The overlap weights are bounded, and minimize the asymptotic variance of the weighted average treatment effect among the class of balancing weights. The overlap weights also possess a desirable small-sample exact balance property, based on which we propose a new method that achieves exact balance for means of any selected set of covariates. Two applications illustrate these methods and compare them with other approaches.

33 pages, 5 figures, 5 tables

References in corpus (1)

• For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis

Cited by in corpus (20)

• Propensity score weighting under limited overlap and model misspecification
• Minimal Dispersion Approximately Balancing Weights: Asymptotic Properties and Practical Considerations
• Estimating heterogeneous survival treatment effect in observational data using machine learning
• Contamination Bias in Linear Regressions
• Distributed Simultaneous Inference in Generalized Linear Models via Confidence Distribution
• How to apply multiple imputation in propensity score matching with partially observed confounders: a simulation study and practical recommendations
• Generative AI for Pull Request Descriptions: Adoption, Impact, and Developer Interventions
• Covariate Adjustment in Randomized Clinical Trials with Missing Covariate and Outcome Data
• Estimating Treatment Effect under Additive Hazards Models with High-dimensional Covariates
• Estimating causal effects with optimization-based methods: A review and empirical comparison
• RNN-based counterfactual prediction, with an application to homestead policy and public schooling
• A Framework for Covariate Balance using Bregman Distances
• Semiparametric Estimation of Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments
• Noise-Induced Randomization in Regression Discontinuity Designs
• Confounding Adjustment Methods for Multi-level Treatment Comparisons Under Lack of Positivity and Unknown Model Specification
• Adjustment for Biased Sampling Using NHANES Derived Propensity Weights
• Robust Sample Weighting to Facilitate Individualized Treatment Rule Learning for a Target Population
• Propensity score matching for estimating a marginal hazard ratio
• A Generalizability Score for Aggregate Causal Effect
• A comparison of methods for estimating the average treatment effect on the treated for externally controlled trials