Minimal Dispersion Approximately Balancing Weights: Asymptotic Properties and Practical Considerations

Abstract

Weighting methods are widely used to adjust for covariates in observational studies, sample surveys, and regression settings. In this paper, we study a class of recently proposed weighting methods which find the weights of minimum dispersion that approximately balance the covariates. We call these weights "minimal weights" and study them under a common optimization framework. The key observation is the connection between approximate covariate balance and shrinkage estimation of the propensity score. This connection leads to both theoretical and practical developments. From a theoretical standpoint, we characterize the asymptotic properties of minimal weights and show that, under standard smoothness conditions on the propensity score function, minimal weights are consistent estimates of the true inverse probability weights. Also, we show that the resulting weighting estimator is consistent, asymptotically normal, and semiparametrically efficient. From a practical standpoint, we present a finite sample oracle inequality that bounds the loss incurred by balancing more functions of the covariates than strictly needed. This inequality shows that minimal weights implicitly bound the number of active covariate balance constraints. We finally provide a tuning algorithm for choosing the degree of approximate balance in minimal weights. We conclude the paper with four empirical studies that suggest approximate balance is preferable to exact balance, especially when there is limited overlap in covariate distributions. In these studies, we show that the root mean squared error of the weighting estimator can be reduced by as much as a half with approximate balance.

41 pages

References in corpus (4)

• For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis
• Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data
• Comment: Performance of Double-Robust Estimators When ``Inverse Probability'' Weights Are Highly Variable
• Balancing Covariates via Propensity Score Weighting

Cited by in corpus (19)

• Transporting Experimental Results with Entropy Balancing
• A Calibration Approach to Transportability and Data-Fusion with Observational Data
• Minimax Linear Estimation of the Retargeted Mean
• Estimating causal effects with optimization-based methods: A review and empirical comparison
• A Framework for Covariate Balance using Bregman Distances
• Entropy Balancing for Causal Generalization with Target Sample Summary Information
• Varying impacts of letters of recommendation on college admissions: Approximate balancing weights for subgroup effects in observational studies
• A Bayesian Gaussian Process for Estimating a Causal Exposure Response Curve in Environmental Epidemiology
• Robust Sample Weighting to Facilitate Individualized Treatment Rule Learning for a Target Population
• Covariate balancing for causal inference on categorical and continuous treatments
• Large Sample Properties of Matching for Balance
• Projected State-action Balancing Weights for Offline Reinforcement Learning
• Deconfounding Scores: Feature Representations for Causal Effect Estimation with Weak Overlap
• End-to-End Balancing for Causal Continuous Treatment-Effect Estimation
• Treatment Effects Estimation by Uniform Transformer
• Optimization of Survey Weights under a Large Number of Conflicting Constraints
• Transfer learning of individualized treatment rules from experimental to real-world data
• Optimal transport weights for causal inference
• On matching-adjusted indirect comparison and calibration estimation