Satellite galaxies around present-day massive ellipticals
arXiv:1312.4533 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu821
Abstract
Using the spectroscopic New York University Value-Added Galaxy Catalogue and the photometric photo-z catalogues of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7, we have explored the satellite distribution around ~1000 massive (M_star > 2x10^11 M_sun) visually classified elliptical galaxies down to a satellite mass ratio of 1:400 (i.e. 5x10^8 < M_sat < 2x10^11 M_sun). Our host galaxies were selected to be representative of a mass complete sample. The satellites of these galaxies were searched within a projected radial distance of 100 kpc to their hosts. We have found that only 20-23 per cent of the massive ellipticals have at least a satellite down to a mass ratio 1:10. This number increases to 45-52 per cent if we explore satellites down to 1:100 and is 60-70 per cent if we go further down to 1:400. The average projected radial distance of the satellites to their hosts is ~59 kpc (which can be decreased at least down to 50 kpc if we account for incompleteness effects). The number of satellites per galaxy host only increases very mildly at decreasing the satellite mass. The fraction of mass which is contained in the satellites down to a mass ratio of 1:400 is 8 per cent of the total mass contained by the hosts. Satellites with a mass ratio from 1:2 to 1:5 (with ~28 per cent of the total mass of the satellites) are the main contributor to the total satellite mass. If the satellites eventually infall into the host galaxies, the merger channel will be largely dominated by satellites with a mass ratio down to 1:10 (as these objects have 68 per cent of the total mass in satellites).
Version matching the published version. 15 pages, 10 figures. Comments are welcome
References in corpus (9)
- Cold streams in early massive hot haloes as the main mode of galaxy formation
- K-corrections and filter transformations in the ultraviolet, optical, and near infrared
- Size evolution of the most massive galaxies at 1.7<z<3 from GOODS NICMOS survey imaging
- The dramatic size evolution of elliptical galaxies and the quasar feedback
- Post-starburst galaxies: more than just an interesting curiosity
- Satellite abundances around bright isolated galaxies
- The Anisotropic Distribution of Satellite Galaxies
- Constraints on the merging channel of massive galaxies since z~1
- Luminous Satellites of Early-Type Galaxies I: Spatial Distribution
Cited by in corpus (17)
- Catalogues of isolated galaxies, isolated pairs, and isolated triplets in the local Universe
- redMaPPer IV: Photometric Membership Identification of Cluster Galaxies with 1% Precision
- A consistent measure of the merger histories of massive galaxies using close-pair statistics I: Major mergers at
- Galaxy pairs in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey - XI. A new method for measuring the influence of the closest companion out to wide separations
- The initial mass function of a massive relic galaxy
- Minor vs Major Mergers: The Stellar Mass Growth of Massive Galaxies from z=3 using Number Density Selection Techniques
- Constraints on the merging channel of massive galaxies since z~1
- The ALHAMBRA survey: Accurate merger fractions by PDF analysis of photometric close pairs
- Mergers and Star Formation: The environment and Stellar Mass Growth of the Progenitors of Ultra-Massive Galaxies since z = 2
- Less than 1% of Core-Collapse Supernovae in the local universe occur in elliptical galaxies
- Evolution of the luminosity-to-halo mass relation of LRGs from a combined SDSS-DR10+RCS2 analysis
- The Carnegie-Irvine Galaxy Survey. IV. A Method to Determine the Average Mass Ratio of Mergers That Built Massive Elliptical Galaxies
- The abundance of satellites depends strongly on the morphology of the host galaxy
- Merger-driven evolution of the effective stellar initial mass function of massive early-type galaxies
- Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): Probing the merger histories of massive galaxies via stellar populations
- Constraints on the evolutionary mechanisms of massive galaxies since from their velocity dispersions
- Assembly bias evidence in close galaxy pairs