paper

On the Relaxation Behaviors of Slow and Classical Glitches: Observational Biases and Their Opposite Recovery Trends

arXiv:1309.2537 · doi:10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/31

Abstract

We study the pulsar timing properties and the data analysis methods during glitch recoveries. In some cases one first fits the time-of-arrivals (TOAs) to obtain the "time-averaged" frequency and its first derivative , and then fits models to them. However, our simulations show that and obtained this way are systematically biased, unless the time intervals between the nearby data points of TOAs are smaller than about s, which is much shorter than typical observation intervals. Alternatively, glitch parameters can be obtained by fitting the phases directly with relatively smaller biases; but the initial recovery timescale is usually chosen by eyes, which may introduce a strong bias. We also construct a phenomenological model by assuming a pulsar's spin-down law of with for a glitch recovery, where is a constant and and are the glitch parameters to be found. This model can reproduce the observed data of slow glitches from B1822--09 and a giant classical glitch of B2334+61, with or , respectively. We then use this model to simulate TOA data and test several fitting procedures for a glitch recovery. The best procedure is: 1) use a very high order polynomial (e.g. to 50th order) to precisely describe the phase; 2) then obtain and from the polynomial; and 3) the glitch parameters are obtained from or . Finally, the uncertainty in the starting time of a classical glitch causes uncertainties to some glitch parameters, but less so to a slow glitch and of which can be determined from data.

36 pages, 11 figures, 6 tables. Accepted for publication in ApJ

References in corpus (8)

Cited by in corpus (4)