Effect of assessment error and private information on stern-judging in indirect reciprocity
arXiv:1308.3025 · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2013.08.006
Abstract
Stern-judging is one of the best-known assessment rules in indirect reciprocity. Indirect reciprocity is a fundamental mechanism for the evolution of cooperation. It relies on mutual monitoring and assessments, i.e., individuals judge, following their own assessment rules, whether other individuals are "good" or "bad" according to information on their past behaviors. Among many assessment rules, stern-judging is known to provide stable cooperation in a population, as observed when all members in the population know all about others' behaviors (public information case) and when the members never commit an assessment error. In this paper, the effect of assessment error and private information on stern-judging is investigated. By analyzing the image matrix, which describes who is good in the eyes of whom in the population, we analytically show that private information and assessment error cause the collapse of stern-judging: all individuals assess other individuals as "good" at random with a probability of 1/2.
18 pages and 2 figures
References in corpus (4)
Cited by in corpus (8)
- Evolution of gossip-based indirect reciprocity on a bipartite network
- Evolutionary stability of cooperation in indirect reciprocity under noisy and private assessment
- Social norms in indirect reciprocity with ternary reputations
- Indirect reciprocity under opinion synchronization
- Local stability of cooperation in a continuous model of indirect reciprocity
- A second-order stability analysis for the continuous model of indirect reciprocity
- Second-order effects of mutation in continuous indirect reciprocity
- We both think you did wrong -- How agreement shapes and is shaped by indirect reciprocity