Gender gap on concept inventories in physics: what is consistent, what is inconsistent, and what factors influence the gap?

Abstract

We review the literature on the gender gap on concept inventories in physics. Across studies of the most commonly used mechanics concept inventories, the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) and Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation (FMCE), mens average pretest scores are always higher than womens, and in most cases mens posttest scores are higher as well. The weighted average gender difference on these tests is 13% for pretest scores, 12% for posttest scores, and 6% for normalized gain. This difference is much smaller than the average difference in normalized gain between traditional lecture and interactive engagement (25%), but it is large enough that it could impact the results of studies comparing the effectiveness of different teaching methods. There is sometimes a gender gap on commonly used electromagnetism concept inventories, but it is usually much smaller and sometimes is zero or favors women. The weighted average gender difference on these tests is 3.7% for pretest scores, 8.5% for posttest scores, and 6% for normalized gain. Based on our analysis of 26 published articles, no single factor is sufficient to explain the gap. Several high-profile studies that have claimed to account for or reduce the gender gap have failed to be replicated in subsequent studies, suggesting that isolated claims of explanations of the gender gap should be interpreted with caution. Other factors, such as gender differences in background preparation, scores on different kinds of assessment, and splits between how students respond to test questions when answering for themselves or for a scientist do contribute to a difference between male and female responses, but the size of these differences is smaller than the size of the overall gender gap, suggesting that the gender gap is most likely due to the combination of many small factors rather than any one factor that can easily be modified.

Cited by in corpus (28)

• Enriching gender in PER: A binary past and a complex future
• Gender Fairness within the Force Concept Inventory
• A longitudinal analysis of students' motivational characteristics in introductory physics courses: Gender differences
• A comparison of Hake's g and Cohen's d for analyzing gains on concept inventories
• Do evidence-based active-engagement courses reduce the gender gap in introductory physics?
• Exploring the Structure of Misconceptions in the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation with Modified Module Analysis
• Multi-Dimensional Item Response Theory and the Force Concept Inventory
• Best Practices for Administering Concept Inventories
• Investigating society's educational debts due to racism and sexism in student attitudes about physics using quantitative critical race theory
• Exploring the Structure of Misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with Modified Module Analysis
• Research-based assessment of students' beliefs about experimental physics: When is gender a factor?
• The impact of perceived recognition by physics instructors on women's self-efficacy and interest
• Extending Modified Module Analysis to Include Correct Responses: An Analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
• PhysPort use and growth: Supporting physics teaching with research-based resources since 2011
• Student Epistemological Framing on Paper-Based Assessments
• Positive attitudinal shifts and a narrowing gender gap: Do expertlike attitudes correlate to higher learning gains for women in the physics classroom?
• Does transitioning to online classes mid-semester affect conceptual understanding?
• Comparing major declaration, attrition, migration, and completion in physics with other STEM disciplines
• An equity investigation of attitudinal shifts in introductory physics
• A three-year comparative study of dominant misconceptions among first-year physics students at a South African university
• Gender gap and polarisation of physics on global courses
• An Online Tutor for Astronomy: The GEAS Self-Review Library
• Perspectives of Women and Men Students and Faculty on Conceptual and Quantitative Problem-Solving in Physics from Introductory to Graduate Levels
• Quantifying critical thinking: Development and validation of the Physics Lab Inventory of Critical thinking (PLIC)
• The impact of incoming preparation and demographics on performance in Physics I: a multi-institution comparison
• Do female physics students benefit from informal physics programs they facilitate?
• Equity in College Physics Student Learning: a Critical Quantitative Intersectionality Investigation
• Using tablets and smartphones as experimental tools in the physics classroom: effects on learning and motivation